PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.On motion to table the motion to reconsider Agreed to by recorded vote: 250 - 172 (Roll No. 79).
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 17, 1993
Sets forth the rule for the further consideration of H. Con. Res. 64 (congressional budget).
People & committees
Rep. Beilenson, Anthony C. [D-CA-24] · D–CA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
On motion to table the motion to reconsider Agreed to by recorded vote: 250 - 172 (Roll No. 79).
House roll call 79 · Individual votesMr. Beilenson moved to table the motion to reconsider.
Mr. Moakley moved to reconsider the vote by which the resolution was agreed to.
Mr. Burton of Indiana objected to the unanimous consent procedure to lay the motion to reconsider the vote by which the resolution was agreed to, on the table.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 251 - 172 (Roll No. 78).
House roll call 78 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 251 - 172 (Roll No. 78).
House roll call 78 · Individual votesOn ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 250 - 172 (Roll no. 77).
House roll call 77 · Individual votesDEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H1417-1426)
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 20.
Rule provides for consideration of H. Con. Res. 64. Previous question shall be considered as ordered. Upon adoption of this resolution the Speaker may declare the House resolved into the Committee of the Whole for the further consideration of the concurrent resolution. Measure will be considered read. Specified amendments are in order. No amendment shall be in order except those printed in the report accompanying this resolution. Said amendments shall be offered and debated as specified in the report and shall not be subject to amendment except as specified. All points of order against the amendments shall be waived. If more than one amendment in the nature of a substitute is adopted, only the last to been adopted shall be considered as finally adopted and reported to the House. At the conclusion of consideration of the resolution and a final 20 minute period of general debate, the Committee shall rise and repor...
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 103-37, by Mr. Beilenson.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 103-37, by Mr. Beilenson.
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Jan 2, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.133 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.133 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.133 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.133 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.