PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jun 25, 2024
This resolution provides for the House of Representatives to consider
H.R. 8774, making appropriations for the Department of Defense for FY2025, and for other purposes.
H.R. 8771, making appropriations for the Department of State, foreign operations, and related programs for FY2025, and for other purposes; and
H.R. 8752, making appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security for FY2025, and for other purposes.
People & committees
Rep. Scott, Austin [R-GA-8] · R–GA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 207 - 201 (Roll no. 284).
House roll call 284 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 207 - 201 (Roll no. 284).
House roll call 284 · Individual votesOn ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 188 - 152 (Roll no. 283). (consideration: CR H4165-4166)
House roll call 283 · Individual votesDEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 1316.
UNANIMOUS CONSENT REQUEST - Mr. Austin Scott (GA) asked unanimous consent that the resolution be amended by adding at the end of the resolution section 18 stating notwithstanding any other provision of this resolution, during consideration of H.R. 8771 pursuant to this resolution, it shall not be in order to consider amendment number 37 printed in part B of House Report 118-559. Agreed to without objection.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H4157-4167; text: CR H4157-4158)
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 83.
The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 8774, H.R. 8771, and H.R. 8752, all under a structured rule. The resolution provides for one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit for each bill.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 118-559, by Mr. Scott, Austin.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 118-559, by Mr. Scott, Austin.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Feb 2, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.1316 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.1316 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.1316 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.1316 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.