Of inquiry directing the Secretary of Health and Human Services to provide to the House of Representatives certain documents in the Secretary's possession regarding the reinterpretation of sections 36B(c)(2)(C)(i)(II) and 5000A(e)(1)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, commonly known as the "fix to the family glitch".

Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 126.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 07 · Reported to House · Sep 28, 2022

This resolution requires the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to provide to the House of Representatives, not later than 14 days after the adoption of this resolution, a copy of each document, memo, correspondence, or other communication between the White House and HHS that refers or relates to the reinterpretation of the tax credit for coverage under a qualified health plan and the requirement to maintain minimum essential health care coverage (commonly known as the fix to the family glitch).

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Buchanan, Vern [R-FL-16] · R–FL

Committees

Ways and Means Committee

1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Rep. Brady, Kevin [R-TX-8]

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Sep 28, 2022
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 126.
Sep 28, 2022
Reported adversely by the Committee on Ways and Means. H. Rept. 117-519.
Sep 28, 2022
Reported adversely by the Committee on Ways and Means. H. Rept. 117-519.
Sep 20, 2022
Ordered to be Reported Adversely by Voice Vote.
Sep 20, 2022
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Sep 19, 2022
Subcommittee on Health Discharged.
Jul 26, 2022
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Jul 26, 2022
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Jul 26, 2022
Introduced in House
Jul 26, 2022
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Reported in House · Sep 28, 2022 Formatted Text PDF Formatted XML
Introduced in House · Jul 26, 2022 Formatted Text PDF Formatted XML

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.Res.1262 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.1262, 117th Congress: Of inquiry directing the Secretary of Health and Human Services to provide to the House of Representatives certain documents in the Secretary's possession regarding the reinterpretation of sections 36B(c)(2)(C)(i)(II) and 5000A(e)(1)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, commonly known as the "fix to the family glitch".

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-resolution/1262

Text version to examine: Reported in House · 2022-09-28.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/hres1262/BILLS-117hres1262rh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T15:05:05Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.Res.1262 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.Res.1262 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.1262, 117th Congress: Of inquiry directing the Secretary of Health and Human Services to provide to the House of Representatives certain documents in the Secretary's possession regarding the reinterpretation of sections 36B(c)(2)(C)(i)(II) and 5000A(e)(1)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, commonly known as the "fix to the family glitch".

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-resolution/1262

Text version to examine: Reported in House · 2022-09-28.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/hres1262/BILLS-117hres1262rh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T15:05:05Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.1262 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.Res.1262 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.1262, 117th Congress: Of inquiry directing the Secretary of Health and Human Services to provide to the House of Representatives certain documents in the Secretary's possession regarding the reinterpretation of sections 36B(c)(2)(C)(i)(II) and 5000A(e)(1)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, commonly known as the "fix to the family glitch".

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-resolution/1262

Text version to examine: Reported in House · 2022-09-28.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/hres1262/BILLS-117hres1262rh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T15:05:05Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.1262 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.Res.1262 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.1262, 117th Congress: Of inquiry directing the Secretary of Health and Human Services to provide to the House of Representatives certain documents in the Secretary's possession regarding the reinterpretation of sections 36B(c)(2)(C)(i)(II) and 5000A(e)(1)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, commonly known as the "fix to the family glitch".

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-resolution/1262

Text version to examine: Reported in House · 2022-09-28.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/hres1262/BILLS-117hres1262rh.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T15:05:05Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.1262 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.