PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 07 · Reported to House · Nov 17, 2020
This resolution sets forth the rule for consideration of H.R. 8294 (National Apprenticeship Act of 2020).
In addition, the resolution further extends certain dates in H.Res. 967, as amended by H.Res. 1107, through the remainder of the 116th Congress.
People & committees
Rep. Morelle, Joseph D. [D-NY-25] · D–NY
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 229 - 170 (Roll no. 224). (text: CR H5942)
House roll call 224 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 229 - 170 (Roll no. 224).(text: CR H5942)
House roll call 224 · Individual votesConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H5949-5950)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - The Chair put the question on agreeing to the resolution and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Woodall demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed the question of agreeing to the resolution until a time to be announced.
On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 227 - 169 (Roll no. 223). (consideration: CR H5948-5949)
House roll call 223 · Individual votesDEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 1224.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H5942-5949)
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 97.
The resolution provides that the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Education and Labor now printed in the bill, modified by the amendment printed in Part A of the Rules Committee report, shall be considered as adopted and the bill, as amended.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 116-593, by Mr. Morelle.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 116-593, by Mr. Morelle.
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.1224 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.1224 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.1224 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.1224 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.