PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 24, 2010
Sets forth the rule for consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill (H.R. 1586) to impose an additional tax on bonuses received from certain TARP recipients.
People & committees
Rep. Slaughter, Louise McIntosh [D-NY-28] · D–NY
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 231 - 190 (Roll no. 188). (text: CR H2325)
House roll call 188 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 231 - 190 (Roll no. 188).(text: CR H2325)
House roll call 188 · Individual votesConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2331-2332)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.Res. 1212, the Chair put the question on adoption of the resolution and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mrs. Slaughter demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the resolution until later in the legislative day.
The previous question was ordered without objection. (consideration: CR H2330)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 1212.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H2325-2330)
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 181.
The resolution provides for consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill with an amendment debatable for one hour. The resolution also provides for the Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend the rules. In addition, the requirement waives the requirement for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the same day it is reported.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 111-456, by Ms. Slaughter.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 111-456, by Ms. Slaughter.
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.1212 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.1212 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.1212 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.1212 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.