PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.On motion to table the motion to reconsider the vote Agreed to by recorded vote: 212 - 183 (Roll no. 290).
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · May 6, 2008
Sets forth the rule for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5818) to authorize the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to make loans to States to acquire foreclosed housing and to make grants to States for related costs.
People & committees
Rep. Castor, Kathy [D-FL-11] · D–FL
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
On motion to table the motion to reconsider the vote Agreed to by recorded vote: 212 - 183 (Roll no. 290).
House roll call 290 · Individual votesMr. Welch (VT) moved to table the motion to reconsider the vote (consideration: CR H3152)
Mrs. Emerson moved to reconsider the vote.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 223 - 192 (Roll no. 289). (text: CR H3119)
House roll call 289 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 223 - 192 (Roll no. 289).(text: CR H3119)
House roll call 289 · Individual votesOn motion to table the motion to reconsider the vote Agreed to by recorded vote: 226 - 186 (Roll no. 288).
House roll call 288 · Individual votesMr. Hastings (FL) moved to table the motion to reconsider the vote (consideration: CR H3150-3151)
Mr. Simpson moved to reconsider the vote.
On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 220 - 187 (Roll no. 287). (consideration: CR H3129, H3150)
House roll call 287 · Individual votesConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3149, H3150)
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3124-3129)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.Res. 1174, the Chair put the question of adoption on ordering the previous question and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Hastings (WA) demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings on ordering the previous question until later in the legislative day.
DEBATE - The House resumed debate on H. Res. 1174.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 1174.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H3119-3124)
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 214.
All points of order against the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived except those arising under clause 10 of rule XXI. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, no amendment to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 110-621, by Ms. Castor.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 110-621, by Ms. Castor.
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.1174 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.1174 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.1174 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.1174 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.