PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Laid on the table.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 3, 1993
Waives provisions of rule XI of the Rules of the House of Representatives that require a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to the House with respect to resolutions reported from such Committee on March 4, 1993, providing for consideration of a bill relating to emergency unemployment compensation.
People & committees
Rep. Bonior, David E. [D-MI-10] · D–MI
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Laid on the table.
Mr. Moakley asked unanimous consent that H. Res. 111 be laid upon the table. Agreed to without objection.
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 14.
Rule provides for consideration of. Waiving the requirement for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to the House with respect to resolutions reported on the legislatve day of March 4, 1993, providing for consideration of a bill relating to emergency unemployment compensation.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 103-25, by Mr. Bonior.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 103-25, by Mr. Bonior.
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jan 2, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.111 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.111 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.111 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.111 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.