PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.Res.1102 / 118th Congress

Providing for the concurrence by the House in the Senate amendment to H.R. 2882, with an amendment.

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Official summary

Version 53 · Passed House · Mar 22, 2024

This resolution provides for House adoption and amendment of H.R. 2882 (Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024).

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Granger, Kay [R-TX-12] · R–TX

Committees

    0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

      Actions

      A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

      1. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

      2. On motion to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 286 - 134 (Roll no. 102). (text: CR H1365-1479)

        House roll call 102 · Individual votes
      3. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 286 - 134 (Roll no. 102). (text: CR H1365-1479)

        House roll call 102 · Individual votes
      4. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H. Res. 1102.

      5. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H1367-1487)

      6. Ms. Granger moved to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution.

      7. Introduced in House

      8. Introduced in House

      Bill text & related measures

      Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

      Related bills identified by Congress.gov

      Source last updated: Jan 15, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

      Explore the bill from different angles

      Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

      Neutral evidence review

      Objective

      Analyze H.Res.1102 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

      View full prompt & sources
      Fairness and public impact

      Progressive lens

      Examine H.Res.1102 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

      View full prompt & sources
      Institutions and government scope

      Conservative lens

      Examine H.Res.1102 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

      View full prompt & sources
      Individual rights and government power

      Liberty lens

      Examine H.Res.1102 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

      View full prompt & sources