PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 11, 2024
Sets forth the rule for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6276) to direct the Administrator of General Services and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to identify the utilization rate of certain public buildings and federally-leased space, and for other purposes, and providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 1065) denouncing the Biden administration's immigration policies.
People & committees
Rep. Massie, Thomas [R-KY-4] · R–KY
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 209 - 206 (Roll no. 82). (text: CR H1106)
House roll call 82 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 209 - 206 (Roll no. 82). (text: CR H1106)
House roll call 82 · Individual votesOn ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 209 - 205 (Roll no. 81).
House roll call 81 · Individual votesConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1115-1116)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 1071, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. McGovern demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 1071.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H1106-1114)
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 66.
The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 6276 under a structured rule with one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit. Resolution provides for consideration of H. Res. 1065 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 118-419, by Mr. Massie.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 118-419, by Mr. Massie.
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Sep 28, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.1071 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.1071 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.1071 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.1071 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.