Recognizing Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory as one of the world's premier science and research institutions.

Referred to the House Committee on Science.

H.Res.1067 through Congress

H.Res.1067 is considered only in the House.

HouseSep 29, 2006IntroducedOfficial record

Major milestones in the imported record. See all actions.

Separate related Senate measures (1)

These are different measures identified as related by Congress.gov. Their text and outcomes may differ; they are not the Senate stage of H.Res.1067.

Related Senate measure: S.Res.595 A resolution recognizing the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory as 1 of the premier science and research institutions of the world.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Sep 29, 2006

Recognizes the outstanding and unique role that the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley, California) has played over the past 75 years in the scientific and technological advancement of our Nation and of the world.

Praises the Laboratory on its great flexibility and foresight in moving from being one of the Nation's original prominent physics laboratories to a highly diversified scientific laboratory of world prominence in a variety of fields.

Congratulates the Laboratory's dedicated employees past and present who have worked to make the institution one of the greatest research resources in the world.

Encourages the laboratory to continue its leadership in pushing the scientific frontiers as we work to address unprecedented challenges whose solutions are grounded in science and technology.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Ehlers, Vernon J. [R-MI-3] · R–MI

Committees

Science, Space, and Technology Committee

1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Rep. Honda, Michael M. [D-CA-15]

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Sep 29, 2006
Referred to the House Committee on Science.
Sep 29, 2006
Introduced in House
Sep 29, 2006
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Introduced in House · Sep 29, 2006 Formatted Text PDF Formatted XML

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

SRES 595 · A resolution recognizing the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory as 1 of the premier science and research institutions of the world.

Source last updated: Jan 2, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.Res.1067 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.1067, 109th Congress: Recognizing Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory as one of the world's premier science and research institutions.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/109th-congress/house-resolution/1067

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 2006-09-29.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/109/bills/hres1067/BILLS-109hres1067ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-02T16:48:10Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.Res.1067 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.Res.1067 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.1067, 109th Congress: Recognizing Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory as one of the world's premier science and research institutions.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/109th-congress/house-resolution/1067

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 2006-09-29.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/109/bills/hres1067/BILLS-109hres1067ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-02T16:48:10Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.1067 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.Res.1067 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.1067, 109th Congress: Recognizing Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory as one of the world's premier science and research institutions.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/109th-congress/house-resolution/1067

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 2006-09-29.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/109/bills/hres1067/BILLS-109hres1067ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-02T16:48:10Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.1067 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.Res.1067 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Res.1067, 109th Congress: Recognizing Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory as one of the world's premier science and research institutions.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/109th-congress/house-resolution/1067

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 2006-09-29.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/109/bills/hres1067/BILLS-109hres1067ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-02T16:48:10Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Res.1067 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.