PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 10, 1999
Sets forth the rule (modified open) for the consideration of H. Con. Res. 42 (use of U.S. armed forces as part of a NATO peacekeeping operation implementing a Kosovo peace agreement).
People & committees
Rep. Diaz-Balart, Lincoln [R-FL-21] · R–FL
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 218 - 201 (Roll no. 46).
House roll call 46 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 218 - 201 (Roll no. 46).
House roll call 46 · Individual votesOn ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 219 - 203 (Roll no. 45).
House roll call 45 · Individual votesDEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 103.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H1179-1189)
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 18.
Rule provides for consideration of H. Con. Res. 42 with 2 hours of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. After general debate the concurrent resolution shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. No amendment shall be in order except those printed in the Congressional Record. each amendment may be offered only by the Member who cause it to be printed or hsi designee. The Chairman may postpone a request for a recorded vote and (2) reduce voting time to five minutes on a postponed question if the vote follows a fifteen minute vote. Measure will be considered read. Bill is open to amendments.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 106-48, by Mr. Diaz-Balart.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 106-48, by Mr. Diaz-Balart.
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.103 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.103 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.103 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.103 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.