PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 105, H. Res. 103 is laid on the table.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 3, 1995
Sets forth the modified open rule for the consideration of H.R. 1058 (Federal securities litigation reform).
People & committees
Rep. Dreier, David [R-CA-28] · R–CA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 105, H. Res. 103 is laid on the table.
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 25.
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1058 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered except motion to recommit. Measure will be considered read. Bill is open to amendments. It shall be in order to consider the amendment printed in the reort of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, if offered in the manner specified. All points of order against the amendment for failure to comply with clause 7 of rule XVI shall be waived. The bill shall be considered for amendment under the 5-minute rule, not to exceed 8 hours. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the amendment to be offered was printed in the Congressional Record.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 104-65, by Mr. Dreier.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 104-65, by Mr. Dreier.
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.103 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.103 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.103 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.103 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.