PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 23, 1993
Sets forth the rule for the consideration of H.R. 920 (emergency unemployment compensation extension).
People & committees
Rep. Bonior, David E. [D-MI-10] · D–MI
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 237 - 178 (Roll no. 39).
House roll call 39 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 237 - 178 (Roll no. 39).
House roll call 39 · Individual votesPoint of order raised by Mr. Walker on the content of the measure. Mr. Walker stated that the amendments made in order by the provisions of H. Res. 103 violate sec. 308 (a) of the Congressional Budget Act. Point of order overruled by the Chair.
On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 243 - 172 (Roll no. 38).
House roll call 38 · Individual votesDEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate.
Point of order raised by Mr. Walker on the content of the measure. Mr. Walker stated that the amendment contained in the Rules Committee report was in violation of section 308 (A) of the Budget Act. Point of order overruled by the Chair.
Point of order raised by Mr. Walker on the content of the measure. Mr. Walker stated that the self-enacting amendments of the Committee on Ways and Means, printed in the bill, and the Committee on Rules, printed in the report accompanying H. Res. 103, were violations of clause 5a of Rule XXI, and clause 47 of Rule XVI, respectively. Point of order overruled by the Chair.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H806-819)
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 12.
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 920 with 2 hours of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. Upon adoption of this resolution, the amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Ways and Means printed in the bill and the amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution (H.Rept. 103-18) shall be considered as adopted. All points of order against the bill, as amended, shall be waived. Bill is closed to amendments.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 103-18, by Mr. Bonior.
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 103-18, by Mr. Bonior.
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Jan 2, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.103 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.103 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.103 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.103 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.