PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Sep 13, 2006
Makes it out of order in the House of Representatives to consider a bill, amendment, or conference report unless: (1) the committee report on the bill includes a list of earmarks in it or in the report (and the names of the requesting Members); (2) the sponsor of the amendment submits for publication in the Congressional Record a list of earmarks in such amendment (and the names of the requesting Members) two legislative days before its consideration; or (3) the accompanying joint explanatory statement on the conference report includes a list of earmarks in it or in such report (and the names of the requesting Members) that were not committed to the conference committee by either chamber, not in the committee report, not published pursuant to this Act, and not in a Senate committee report on a companion measure.
Makes it out of order in the House to consider a rule or order that waives the requirements of this Act with respect to consideration of conference reports.
Provides that, if the Committee on Rules reports a resolution making in order a bill for initial House consideration and providing for consideration, adoption, or passage of text not otherwise subject to this Act, the Committee shall include a list of earmarks in the measure (and the names of the requesting Members).
Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.
Defines earmark to include tariff relief and targeted tax benefits.
People & committees
Rep. Lewis, Jerry [R-CA-41] · R–CA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Res.1001 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Res.1001 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Res.1001 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Res.1001 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.