PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.995 / 115th Congress

21st Century Respect Act

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 513.

Official summary

Version 01 · Reported to Senate with amendment(s) · Jul 12, 2018

21st Century Respect Act

This bill requires the Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the General Services Administration to change the terminology used to describe the racial background or place of origin of people in regulations concerning: (1) USDA programs for financing and insuring loans for properties in rural areas, and (2) the 1974 development plan for Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington, DC.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Jeffries, Hakeem S. [D-NY-8] · D–NY

Committees

  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
  • Agriculture Committee
  • Natural Resources Committee
4 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 513.

  2. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Murkowski with amendments and an amendment to the title. With written report No. 115-300.

  3. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Murkowski with amendments and an amendment to the title. With written report No. 115-300.

  4. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported with amendments favorably.

  5. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Public Lands, Forests, and Mining. Hearings held. With printed Hearing: S.Hrg. 115-502.

  6. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

  7. The title of the measure was amended. Agreed to without objection.

  8. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  9. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H9448)

  10. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H9448)

  11. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 995.

  12. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H9448-9449)

  13. Mr. Tipton moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  14. Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 104.

  15. Committee on Agriculture discharged.

  16. Committee on Agriculture discharged.

  17. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 115-427, Part I.

  18. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 115-427, Part I.

  19. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Unanimous Consent.

  20. Subcommittee on Indian, Insular and Alaska Native Affairs Discharged.

  21. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  22. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  23. Referred to the Subcommittee on Indian, Insular and Alaska Native Affairs.

  24. Referred to the Subcommittee on Commodity Exchanges, Energy, and Credit.

  25. Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  26. Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  27. Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  28. Introduced in House

  29. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.995 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.995 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.995 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.995 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources