To improve the administration of the Women's Right National Historical Park in the State of New York, and for other purposes.

Measure incorporated in H.R. 4236.

H.R.970 through Congress

H.R.970 keeps its number as it moves between the House and Senate.

HouseFeb 15, 1995IntroducedOfficial record

Major milestones in the imported record. See all actions.

No Senate action is available in our imported record yet.

Separate related Senate measures (1)

These are different measures identified as related by Congress.gov. Their text and outcomes may differ; they are not the Senate stage of H.R.970.

Related Senate bill: S.127 A bill to improve the administration of the Women's Rights National Historical Park in the State of New York, and for other purposes.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 15, 1995

Authorizes appropriations for fiscal years after September 30, 1994, for the Women's Rights National Historical Park in Seneca Falls and Waterloo, New York. Extends the Women's Rights National Historical Park Advisory Commission to the year 2005. Removes the Bloomer House property from the list of designated sites composing the Park.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Slaughter, Louise McIntosh [D-NY-28] · D–NY

Committees

Natural Resources Committee

14 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Sep 28, 1996
Measure incorporated in H.R. 4236.
Apr 18, 1996
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Apr 18, 1996
Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Dec 7, 1995
Subcommittee Hearings Held.
Feb 21, 1995
Executive Comment Requested from Interior.
Feb 21, 1995
Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Lands.
Feb 15, 1995
Referred to the House Committee on Resources.
Feb 15, 1995
Introduced in House
Feb 15, 1995
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Introduced in House · Feb 15, 1995 Formatted Text PDF

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

S 127 · A bill to improve the administration of the Women's Rights National Historical Park in the State of New York, and for other purposes.

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.970 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.970, 104th Congress: To improve the administration of the Women's Right National Historical Park in the State of New York, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/104th-congress/house-bill/970

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1995-02-15.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/104/bills/hr970/BILLS-104hr970ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T15:29:11Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.R.970 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.970 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.970, 104th Congress: To improve the administration of the Women's Right National Historical Park in the State of New York, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/104th-congress/house-bill/970

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1995-02-15.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/104/bills/hr970/BILLS-104hr970ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T15:29:11Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.970 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.970 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.970, 104th Congress: To improve the administration of the Women's Right National Historical Park in the State of New York, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/104th-congress/house-bill/970

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1995-02-15.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/104/bills/hr970/BILLS-104hr970ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T15:29:11Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.970 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.970 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.970, 104th Congress: To improve the administration of the Women's Right National Historical Park in the State of New York, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/104th-congress/house-bill/970

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1995-02-15.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/104/bills/hr970/BILLS-104hr970ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T15:29:11Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.970 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.