PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 5, 1997
TABLE OF CONTENTS: Title I: Termination of Committee on Standards of Official Conduct in the House of Representatives Title II: Establishment of Commission Title III: General Provisions Ethics Reform Act of 1997 - Title I: Termination of Committee on Standards of Official Conduct in the House of Representatives - Amends: (1) rule X of the Rules of the House of Representatives to terminate the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct; (2) the Ethics Reform Act of 1989 to repeal provisions regarding that Committee; and (3) specified Rules and laws to replace references to the Committee with references to the Independent Commission on House Ethics established in title II. Title II: Establishment of Commission - Establishes within the legislative branch the Independent Commission on House Ethics. Prescribes as duties of the Commission: (1) recommending to the House appropriate administrative actions to establish or enforce standards of official conduct for Members, officers, and employees of the House; (2) investigating alleged violations of such standards and reporting its findings and recommendations to the House; (3) reporting to appropriate Federal or State authorities, with House approval, any substantial evidence of violations of law applicable to the performance of duties or the discharge of responsibilities by such persons; (4) considering requests of such persons for, and publishing, advisory opinions; and (5) providing information and guidance to such persons regarding standards of conduct. Sets forth procedural requirements for undertaking an investigation and disclosing results. Directs the Commission to establish an Office on Advice and Education to: (1) provide information and guidance to, and to conduct educational briefings for, such persons regarding standards of conduct; and (2) recommend to the Commission advisory opinions of general applicability. Title III: General Provisions - Requires investigations pending before the Committee on the day before the enactment of this Act to be continued by the Commission. Sets forth provisions regarding: (1) publication in the Congressional Record of the Commission's reports to the House; and (2) House consideration of Commission recommendations for action.
People & committees
Rep. Shays, Christopher [R-CT-4] · R–CT
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.957 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.957 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.957 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.957 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.