PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.931 / 115th Congress

Firefighter Cancer Registry Act of 2018

Became Public Law No: 115-194.

Official summary

Version 49 · Public Law · Jul 7, 2018

Firefighter Cancer Registry Act of 2018

(Sec. 2) This bill requires the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to develop and maintain a voluntary registry of firefighters in order to collect history and occupational information that can be used to determine the incidence of cancer among firefighters. The registry must be used to improve monitoring of cancer among firefighters and to collect and publish epidemiological information. The CDC should seek to include specified information in the registry, including the number and type of fire incidents attended by an individual.

To collect information for the registry, the CDC must enable the registry to connect to state-based cancer registries.

The CDC must also: (1) develop a strategy to encourage participation in the registry, (2) develop guidance for states and firefighting agencies regarding the registry, and (3) seek feedback on the registry from nonfederal experts.

The CDC must make registry data available to the public and in accordance with privacy laws.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Collins, Chris [R-NY-27] · R–NY

Committees

  • Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee
  • Energy and Commerce Committee
188 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 115-194.

  2. Became Public Law No: 115-194.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  8. On motion that the House agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to without objection. (text: CR H5572)

  9. Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to without objection.(text: CR H5572)

  10. Mr. Collins (NY) asked unanimous consent to take from the Speaker's table and agree to the Senate amendment. (consideration: CR H5572-5573)

  11. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  12. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  13. Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.

  14. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.

  15. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S2631-2632)

  16. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions discharged by Unanimous Consent.

  17. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions discharged by Unanimous Consent.

  18. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

  19. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  20. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H7248-7249)

  21. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H7248-7249)

  22. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 931.

  23. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H7248-7251)

  24. Mr. Walden moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  25. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 215.

  26. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 115-301.

  27. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 115-301.

  28. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

  29. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  30. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Voice Vote .

  31. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  32. Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.

  33. Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

  34. Introduced in House

  35. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Dec 5, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.931 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.931 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.931 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.931 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources