PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Became Public Law No: 103-134.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 17, 1993
Designates the Pittsburgh Aviary in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, as the National Aviary in Pittsburgh.
People & committees
Rep. Coyne, William J. [D-PA-14] · D–PA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 103-134.
Became Public Law No: 103-134.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S14525)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S14525)
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 235.
Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported to Senate by Senator Baucus without amendment. Without written report.
Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported to Senate by Senator Baucus without amendment. Without written report.
Committee on Environment and Public Works. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Received in the Senate.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H4524-4525)
Mr. Studds moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 65.
Reported by the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries. H. Rept. 103-169.
Reported by the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries. H. Rept. 103-169.
Executive Comment Received from Interior.
Subcommittee on Environment and Natural Resources Discharged.
Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Executive Comment Requested from Interior.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Environment and Natural Resources.
Referred to the House Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E345)
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.927 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.927 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.927 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.927 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.