PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.917 / 103rd Congress

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require an investigation of Internal Revenue Service abuse of taxpayers' rights, to safeguard taxpayer rights, to monitor the effectiveness of the Internal Revenue Service's program for the prevention of taxpayer abuse, and for other purposes.

Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H7710)

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 16, 1993

Requires the Secretary of the Treasury to report to specified committees annually on the program to prevent abuses of taxpayers' rights by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Requires the Comptroller General to report to specified congressional committees on: (1) an investigation of past instances in which the Service has abused taxpayers' rights or has engaged in other significant misconduct; and (2) an assessment and evaluation of the implementation and effectiveness of the program to prevent such abuses. Provides access to returns and return information by the Comptroller General to carry out the purposes of this Act. Amends the Internal Revenue Code to establish in the IRS the Office of Taxpayers' Advocate, headed by the Taxpayers' Advocate. Requires the Office to: (1) assist taxpayers in resolving problems with the IRS; (2) identify areas in which taxpayers have problems in dealings with the IRS; (3) propose changes in the administrative practices of the IRS to mitigate such problems; and (4) identify potential legislative changes which may be appropriate to mitigate such problems. Requires the Taxpayers' Advocate to annually report to specified congressional committees on Office activities. Requires the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to establish procedures requiring a formal response to all recommendations submitted to the Commissioner by the Taxpayers' Advocate. Requires the Secretary of the Treasury to report to specified congressional committees on the effectiveness of the taxpayer-rights education program for its officers and employees. Requires the Secretary to report biennially to specified congressional committees on all cases involving complaints about misconduct of IRS employees and the disposition of the complaints.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Traficant, James A., Jr. [D-OH-17] · D–OH

Committees

  • Ways and Means Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H7710)

    2. Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

    3. Introduced in House

    4. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Jan 2, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.917 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.917 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.917 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.917 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources