PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Committee on Energy and Natural Resources requested executive comment from Department of the Interior and Office of Management and Budget.
Congressional Research Service
Version 17 · Reported to House with amendment(s) · Sep 5, 1997
American Land Sovereignty Protection Act - Amends the National Historic Preservation Act Amendments of 1980 to prohibit the Secretary of the Interior from nominating any Federal lands for inclusion on the World Heritage List pursuant to the Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage unless: (1) the Secretary publishes a finding that commercially viable uses of nominated lands and lands within ten miles of them will not be adversely affected by such inclusion; (2) the Secretary has reported to the Congress on the lands' natural resources and the impact that the inclusion would have on existing and future uses of such lands; and (3) such nomination is specifically authorized by a law. Authorizes the President to submit proposals for legislation authorizing such a nomination after publication of the Secretary's finding. Requires the Secretary to object to the inclusion of any property in the United States on the list of World Heritage in Danger (established under the Convention) unless the Secretary: (1) has reported to the Congress on the necessity for such inclusion, the natural resources associated with the property, and the impact such inclusion would have on existing and future uses of such property; and (2) is specifically authorized to assent to the inclusion by a joint resolution of the Congress enacted after the report is submitted. Directs the Secretary to submit an annual report to specified congressional committees on the management of each World Heritage Site within the United States. (Sec. 4) Prohibits any Federal official from nominating any lands in the United States for designation as a Biosphere Reserve under the Man and Biosphere Program of the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. Provides that any such designation before enactment of this Act shall not have any force or effect, unless the Biosphere Reserve: (1) is specifically authorized by a law enacted before December 31, 2000; (2) consists solely of federally owned lands; and (3) is subject to a management plan that specifically ensures that the use of intermixed or adjacent non-Federal property is not limited or restricted as a result of that designation. Directs the Secretary of State to report annually to specified congressional committees information on the management of each Biosphere Reserve within the United States. (Sec. 5) Prohibits any Federal official from nominating, classifying, or designating any Federal land located within the United States for a special or restricted use under any international agreement for conserving, preserving, or protecting the terrestrial or marine environment, flora, or fauna (with specified exceptions) unless specifically authorized by law, but authorizes the Secretary to submit proposals for authorizing legislation. Provides that any such nomination, classification, or designation of private or State or local lands shall have no force or effect without the owner's consent or specific authorization by State or local law, respectively.
People & committees
Rep. Young, Don [R-AK-At Large] · R–AK
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources requested executive comment from Department of the Interior and Office of Management and Budget.
Subcommittee on Parks, Preservation and Recreation. Hearings held.
Referred to Subcommittee on Parks, Preservation and Recreation.
Received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On passage Passed by recorded vote: 236 - 191 (Roll no. 504).
House roll call 504 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 236 - 191 (Roll no. 504).
House roll call 504 · Individual votesThe House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to a previous order of the House.
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 901.
An amendment to strike section 4 (b) from the bill.
The Vento amendment would require that no federal official may nominate, classify, or designate any lands owned by the U.S. for special, commercial, or restricted use under any international agreement unless such nomination, classification, or designation is specifically authorized by law.
The Farr amendment, printed as amendment No. 5 in the Congressional Record of September 25, 1997 would exempt the California Coastal Ranges Biosphere Reserve from the provisions of the bill.
The Chair announced the unfinished business to be the further consideration of amendments on which recorded votes had previously been requested and postponed in the following order: Farr amendment, Vento amendment, and the Miller (CA) amendment.
The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H8663-8666)
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 901 as unfinished business.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Miller of (CA) amendment, the Chair put the question and by voice declared that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Miller of (CA) demanded a recorded vote and pending that, made a point of order that a quorum was not present. The Chair postponed further proceedings on the amendment and the point of no quorum was withdrawn.
DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with 30 minutes of debate on the Miller of (CA) amendment.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Vento amendment, the Chair put the question on the amendment and by voice vote, declared that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Vento demanded a recorded vote and pending that, made a point of order that a quorum was not present. Pursuant to a unanimous consent agreement, the Chair postponed further proceedings on the amendment and the point of no quorum was considered as withdrawn.
DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with 30 minutes of debate on the Vento amendment.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Farr amendment, the Chair put the question on the amendment and by voice vote, declared that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Farr demanded a recorded vote and pending that, made a point of order that a quorum was not present. Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Chair postponed further proceedings on the amendment and the point of no quorum was considered as withdrawn.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the previous unanimous consent agreement, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 30 minutes of debate on the Farr (CA) amendment.
The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
Considered as unfinished business.
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 901 as unfinished business.
On motion that the Committee rise Agreed to by voice vote.
Mr. Young (AK) moved that the Committee rise.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the previous unanimous consent agreement, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 30 minutes of debate on the Vento amendment.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the previous unanimous consent agreement, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 30 minutes of debate on the Brown (CA) amendment.
GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate.
The Speaker designated the Honorable John E. Sununu to act as Chairman of the Committee.
The House resolved into Committee of the Whole on the state of the Union pursuant to previous order of the House.
Considered by previous order. (consideration: CR H8538-8566)
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 257 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 901 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. The amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Resources now printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted. Measure will be considered read. A specified amendment is in order. The amendment made in order by Mr. Miller of California shall be debatable for not to exceed one hour, equally divided and controlled. Upon the adoption of the resolution, H. Res. 243 shall be laid on the table.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 243 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 901 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. Bill is open to amendments. It shall be in order to consider to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Resources now printed in the bill.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 141.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 105-245.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 105-245.
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 26 - 9.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Committee Hearings Held.
Field Hearings Held in Tannersville, New York.
Executive Comment Requested from Interior, State.
Referred to the House Committee on Resources.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.901 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.901 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.901 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.901 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.