PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.8946 / 118th Congress

Reversionary Interest Conveyance Act

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jul 8, 2024

Reversionary Interest Conveyance Act

This bill directs the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to offer to sell the reversionary interest of the United States in approximately 8.43 acres of land in Sacramento, California, as generally depicted on a specified map dated November 7, 2022. Within two years of receiving a request from the owner of the land, the BLM must offer the reversionary interest and convey the reversionary interest to the buyer upon payment. The payment must be in an amount that is at least the fair market value of the reversionary interest. The buyer must also pay all costs related to the applicable conveyance of the reversionary interest, including all surveys, appraisals, and other administrative costs.

The bill subjects the conveyance to valid existing rights.

The proceeds from the sale must be deposited into Federal Land Disposal Account.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Matsui, Doris O. [D-CA-7] · D–CA

Committees

  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
  • Natural Resources Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

    2. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    3. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H7285)

    4. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H7285)

    5. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 8946.

    6. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H7285-7286)

    7. Mr. Westerman moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

    8. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 689.

    9. Reported by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 118-844.

    10. Reported by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 118-844.

    11. Ordered to be Reported by Unanimous Consent.

    12. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

    13. Subcommittee on Federal Lands Discharged

    14. Subcommittee Hearings Held

    15. Referred to the Subcommittee on Federal Lands.

    16. Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

    17. Introduced in House

    18. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Oct 26, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.8946 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.8946 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.8946 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.8946 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources