PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.See H.R.4296.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 16, 1993
Amends the Federal criminal code to prohibit the possession (except for lawful and continuous possession since before the enactment date) or transfer of assault weapons. Exempts any firearm which the Secretary of the Treasury has determined is of a type generally recognized as particularly suitable for, or readily adaptable to, sporting purposes. Provides for: (1) penalties for the unlawful possession or transfer of an assault weapon; and (2) an enhanced penalty for possession or use of an assault weapon during a crime of violence or a drug trafficking crime.
People & committees
Rep. Gutierrez, Luis V. [D-IL-4] · D–IL
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
See H.R.4296.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime and Criminal Justice.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E358-359)
Referred to the House Committee on Judiciary.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Jun 2, 2021. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.893 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.893 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.893 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.893 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.