Protections and Transparency in the Workplace Act

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Sep 30, 2020

Protections and Transparency in the Workplace Act

This bill requires issuers of securities to disclose regularly information related to claims of

discrimination because of race, color, religion, sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity), or national origin;

discrimination because of age;

discrimination on the basis of disability;

discrimination because of genetic information;

discrimination on the basis of status concerning service in a uniformed service;

sexual harassment; and

sexual assault or abuse.

In investigating claims of discrimination or harassment, an issuer must hire an independent, third-party law firm agreed to by all parties involved.

Issuers must implement discrimination and harassment training programs for employees, conduct an annual survey of employees to determine whether employees feel safe, and establish an anonymous whistleblower tip line.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Lieu, Ted [D-CA-33] · D–CA

Committees

Financial Services Committee

0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Sep 30, 2020
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Sep 30, 2020
Introduced in House
Sep 30, 2020
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Introduced in House · Sep 30, 2020 Formatted Text PDF Formatted XML

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

HR 562 · Protections and Transparency in the Workplace Act

Source last updated: Jan 3, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.8458 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.8458, 116th Congress: Protections and Transparency in the Workplace Act

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/8458

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 2020-09-30.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/hr8458/BILLS-116hr8458ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-03T03:39:38Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.R.8458 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.8458 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.8458, 116th Congress: Protections and Transparency in the Workplace Act

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/8458

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 2020-09-30.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/hr8458/BILLS-116hr8458ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-03T03:39:38Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.8458 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.8458 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.8458, 116th Congress: Protections and Transparency in the Workplace Act

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/8458

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 2020-09-30.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/hr8458/BILLS-116hr8458ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-03T03:39:38Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.8458 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.8458 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.8458, 116th Congress: Protections and Transparency in the Workplace Act

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/8458

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 2020-09-30.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/hr8458/BILLS-116hr8458ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-03T03:39:38Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.8458 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.