PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Ordered to be Reported.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 7, 1995
Rescinds certain budget authority for the following: (1) the Immigration Emergency Fund of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, Department of Justice; (2) the Advanced Technology Program of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Department of Commerce; (3) Department of Energy atomic energy defense activities; (4) funds appropriated to the President for contributions to the African Development Fund and assistance for the new independent states of the former Soviet Union; (5) clean coal technology of the Department of Energy; (6) training and employment services of the Department of Labor; (7) school improvement programs of the Department of Education; (8) certain Federal Railroad Administration programs under the Department of Transportation; and (9) wind tunnel construction for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
People & committees
Rep. Livingston, Bob [R-LA-1] · R–LA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Ordered to be Reported.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 13.
Reported by the Committee on Appropriations. H. Rept. 104-30.
Reported by the Committee on Appropriations. H. Rept. 104-30.
Referred to the House Committee on Appropriations.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.845 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.845 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.845 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.845 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.