Western Great Lakes Wolf Management Act of 2011

Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 28, 2011

Western Great Lakes Wolf Management Act of 2011 - Prohibits any wolf (species, subspecies, or population segment of Canis lupus) in Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan from being treated under any status of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, including as an endangered species, a threatened species, an essential experimental population, or a nonessential experimental population.

Provides that each state shall have exclusive jurisdiction over the management of wolves within its borders.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Kline, John [R-MN-2] · R–MN

Committees

Natural Resources Committee

13 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Feb 28, 2011
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Feb 28, 2011
Introduced in House
Feb 28, 2011
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Introduced in House · Feb 28, 2011 Formatted Text PDF Formatted XML

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

HR 510 · Idaho and Montana Wolf Management Act of 2011

Source last updated: Aug 14, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.838 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.838, 112th Congress: Western Great Lakes Wolf Management Act of 2011

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/112th-congress/house-bill/838

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 2011-02-28.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/112/bills/hr838/BILLS-112hr838ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-08-14T14:19:41Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.R.838 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.838 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.838, 112th Congress: Western Great Lakes Wolf Management Act of 2011

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/112th-congress/house-bill/838

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 2011-02-28.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/112/bills/hr838/BILLS-112hr838ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-08-14T14:19:41Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.838 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.838 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.838, 112th Congress: Western Great Lakes Wolf Management Act of 2011

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/112th-congress/house-bill/838

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 2011-02-28.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/112/bills/hr838/BILLS-112hr838ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-08-14T14:19:41Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.838 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.838 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.838, 112th Congress: Western Great Lakes Wolf Management Act of 2011

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/112th-congress/house-bill/838

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 2011-02-28.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/112/bills/hr838/BILLS-112hr838ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-08-14T14:19:41Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.838 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.