National Historic Preservation Act Amendments of 2000
Became Public Law No: 106-208.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 01 · Reported to Senate with amendment(s) · Mar 9, 2000
National Historic Preservation Act Amendments of 1999 - Amends the National Historic Preservation Act to reauthorize the Historic Preservation Fund and the Advisory Council for Historic Preservation through FY 2005.Revises the requirement that Federal agencies use available historic properties before acquiring, constructing, or leasing buildings for agency purposes to require that such use be in accordance with Executive Order 13006, issued May 21, 1996 (61 F.R. 26071) (encouraging Federal agency use of historic properties located in central cities).Makes technical and conforming amendments to the Act, including changing from mandatory to discretionary the authority of the Secretary of the Interior to administer grants in lieu of a program of matching grant-in-aid to the National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States.
The title of the measure was amended. Agreed to without objection.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendments Agreed to by voice vote. (consideration: CR H3478-3479; text: CR H3478-3479)
Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendments Agreed to by voice vote.(consideration: CR H3478-3479; text: CR H3478-3479)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 834.
Mr. Hefley moved that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendments.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate with an amendment and an amendment to the Title by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2795; text of measure as passed Senate: CR S2795)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment and an amendment to the Title by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S2795; text of measure as passed Senate: CR S2795)
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 453.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Murkowski with an amendment in the nature of a substitute and an amendment to the title. With written report No. 106-237.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Murkowski with an amendment in the nature of a substitute and an amendment to the title. With written report No. 106-237.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Subcommittee on Parks, Preservation and Recreation. Hearings held.
Received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H8408)
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H8408)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 834.
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H8408-8409)
Mr. Hefley moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 138.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 106-241.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 106-241.
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Subcommittee Hearings Held.
Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks and Public Lands.
Referred to the House Committee on Resources.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.834 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.834 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.834 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.834 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.