To authorize the Secretary of Energy to lease lands within the naval oil shale reserves to private entities for the development and production of oil and natural gas.
Unfavorable Executive Comment Received from DOE.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 3, 1995
Amends Federal law to authorize the Secretary of Energy to lease Federal lands inside a certain naval oil shale reserve to a private entity for petroleum exploration and development. Permits the Bureau of Land Management to serve as leasing agents of the Secretary. Conditions the lease of lands in an oil shale reserve upon payment of a royalty rate equivalent to that prevailing for similar leases in the State in which the reserve is located. Authorizes the Secretary to require that all or a portion of the Federal share of the royalty be paid in the form of petroleum. Mandates that 50 percent of the proceeds received from royalty and other payments made by a lessee be paid to the State within which the leased lands are located. Authorizes the Secretary to transfer existing Federal equipment inside a naval oil shale reserve if the lessee assumes responsibility for it.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Military Readiness.
Executive Comment Requested from DOD, DOE.
Executive Comment Requested from Interior, DOE.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources.
Referred to the Committee on National Security, and in addition to the Committee on Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on National Security, and in addition to the Committee on Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on National Security, and in addition to the Committee on Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jun 6, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.817 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.817 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.817 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.817 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.