PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.8012 / 118th Congress

Jackie Robinson Ballpark National Commemorative Site Act

Became Public Law No: 118-247.

Official summary

Version 49 · Public Law · Jan 4, 2025

Jackie Robinson Ballpark National Commemorative Site Act

This act designates the Jackie Robinson Ballpark in Daytona Beach, Florida, as the Jackie Robinson Ballpark National Commemorative Site. It also makes the site a part of the African American Civil Rights Network established under the African American Civil Rights Network Act of 2017.

In addition, the act directs the Department of the Interior to conduct a special resource study of the site to evaluate its national significance and determine the suitability and feasibility of designating the site as a national historic landmark.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Waltz, Michael [R-FL-6] · R–FL

Committees

  • Natural Resources Committee
50 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 118-247.

  2. Became Public Law No: 118-247.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  8. Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S7287-7288)

  9. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.

  10. Received in the Senate, read twice.

  11. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  12. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (consideration: CR H7283)

  13. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (consideration: CR H7283)

  14. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 8012.

  15. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H7283-7284)

  16. Mr. Westerman moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  17. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 693.

  18. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 118-848.

  19. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 118-848.

  20. Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by Unanimous Consent.

  21. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

  22. Subcommittee on Federal Lands Discharged

  23. Subcommittee Hearings Held

  24. Referred to the Subcommittee on Federal Lands.

  25. Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

  26. Introduced in House

  27. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Jul 17, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.8012 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.8012 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.8012 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.8012 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources