PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.782 / 106th Congress

Older Americans Act Amendments of 2000

Became Public Law No: 106-501.

Official summary

Version 17 · Reported to House with amendment(s) · Sep 28, 1999

Older Americans Amendments of 1999 - Revises the Older Americans Act of 1965 in toto.Older Americans Act of 1999 - Retains the Administration on Aging in the Office of the Secretary of Health and Human Services, as well as the Assistant Secretary for Aging. Directs the Assistant Secretary to establish: (1) an Office on Native Americans (currently, the Office for American Indian, Alaskan Native, and Native Hawaiian Programs); and (2) an office of long-term care ombudsman programs (currently, the Office of Long-term Care Ombudsman Programs).(Sec. 3) Directs the Assistant Secretary to designate individuals with pertinent expertise who shall be responsible for administration of: (1) grants for Native American programs on aging; (2) Federal activities relating to State long-term care ombudsman programs; and (3) nutrition services.Revises the duties of the Assistant Secretary. Directs the Assistant Secretary to: (1) make education and training grants to institutions of higher education, historically Black colleges or universities, Hispanic Centers of Excellence in Applied Gerontology, and other educational institutions that serve the needs of minority students, to prepare students for careers in the field of aging; (2) establish and carry out pension rights demonstration projects; and (3) make grants to eligible public agencies and nonprofit private organizations for health care service demonstration projects through multipurpose senior centers in rural areas.Authorizes the Assistant Secretary or the Secretary of Labor, as the case may be, to bar recipients from receiving grants under this Act for a maximum five-year period for misuse of such funds. Repeals the specific mandate for the Assistant Secretary to engage in certain activities with respect to policy alternatives for long-term care.Eliminates the National Center on Elder Abuse, the National Aging Information Center, and the Federal Council on the Aging.Authorizes appropriations.Revises and consolidates programs of grants to Native Americans, Alaskan Natives, and Native Hawaiians for the delivery costs of supportive and nutrition services. Prescribes the distribution of funds among the appropriate organizations. Retains the Secretary of the Interior's authority, acting through the Bureau of Indian Affairs, to make surplus educational facilities available for multipurpose senior centers. Authorizes appropriations.Revises the programs of grants for State and community programs on aging. Prescribes the allotment of funds for supportive services, multipurpose senior centers, and nutrition and family care giver services, including additional funds for State long-term care ombudsman programs and for services for the prevention and remediation of elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation. Requires State and area plans to provide an opportunity for older individuals to contribute voluntarily to the cost of services. Expands the scope of such services to include: (1) home delivered nutrition services; (2) disaster relief reimbursements to grant recipients; (3) grants for authorized programs for disease prevention and health promotion services; and (4) family caregiver programs. Retains basic existing requirements for such grants, services, and centers.Eliminates certain rights relating to in-home services for frail older individuals.Repeals authority for: (1) school-based meals for volunteer older individuals and multigenerational programs; (2) specified in-home services for frail older individuals; (3) additional assistance for the special needs of older individuals; (4) specified disease prevention and health promotion services; (5) supportive activities for caretakers who provide in-home services for frail older individuals; (6) specified research; (7) numerous specified demonstration projects, including those concerning ombudsman and advocacy, housing, and pension rights; and (8) numerous specified grant programs, including the neighborhood senior care program, Resource Centers for Native American Elders, and career preparation for the field of aging.Authorizes appropriations.Revises requirements for State long-term care ombudsman programs. Repeals the mandate that a State agency establish an Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. Requires the State agency to perform the functions of such Office directly, or contract them out to a public agency or nonprofit private organization.Continues the current mandate for State programs for the prevention and remediation of elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation; but repeals all specific requirements except those relating to whistleblower immunity, record confidentiality, training, and the prohibition against involuntary participation by alleged victims, abusers, or members of their households.Repeals mandates for State programs for: (1) development of legal and advocacy assistance as a means for ensuring a comprehensive elder rights system; and (2) outreach, counseling, and assistance for insurance and public benefits.Authorizes appropriations for State long-term care ombudsman programs and programs for the prevention and remediation of elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation.Older American Community Service Employment Act of 1999 - Replaces the current authority of the Secretary of Labor to establish an older American community service employment program with a mandate to make competitive grants to States and public and nonprofit private organizations to provide unemployed low-income older individuals, with otherwise poor employment prospects, employment opportunities in providing community services. Revises grant and employment project requirements. Provides for allotments and reservation of funds for such grants. Requires the Secretary of Labor to: (1) establish objective performance standards for projects; and (2) contract with nongovernmental entities to makes independent evaluations of grant recipient performance. Authorizes appropriations.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Barrett, Bill [R-NE-3] · R–NE

Committees

  • Education and Workforce Committee
7 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 106-501.

  2. Became Public Law No: 106-501.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  8. Passed Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 94 - 0. Record Vote Number: 285.

    Senate roll call 285 · Individual votes
  9. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 94 - 0. Record Vote Number: 285.

    Senate roll call 285 · Individual votes
  10. Measure laid before Senate. (consideration: CR S11035-11041, S11055-11064, S11088-11097)

  11. Received in the Senate.

  12. The title of the measure was amended. Agreed to without objection.

  13. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  14. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 405 - 2 (Roll no. 547). (text: CR 10/24/2000 H10582-10600)

    House roll call 547 · Individual votes
  15. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 405 - 2 (Roll no. 547).(text: CR 10/24/2000 H10582-10600)

    House roll call 547 · Individual votes
  16. Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H10841-10842)

  17. At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.

  18. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 782.

  19. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H10581-10606)

  20. Mr. McKeon moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  21. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 198.

  22. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Education and the Workforce. H. Rept. 106-343.

  23. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Education and the Workforce. H. Rept. 106-343.

  24. Subcommittee on Postsecondary Education, Training and Life-Long Learning Discharged.

  25. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

  26. Subcommittee Hearings Held.

  27. Subcommittee Hearings Held.

  28. Subcommittee Hearings Held.

  29. Referred to the Subcommittee on Postsecondary Education, Training and Life-Long Learning.

  30. Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.

  31. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H665)

  32. Introduced in House

  33. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Jul 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.782 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.782 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.782 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.782 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources