To reauthorize the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act.

Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Voice Vote.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 3, 1993

Amends the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act to replace title IV (Miscellaneous Provisions) with provisions authorizing appropriations to carry out the Act. (The provisions which would be replaced by this Act include provisions relating to: (1) the definition of "waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States" under the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972; (2) the definition of "fisheries zone" under the Atlantic Tunas Convention Act of 1975; and (3) a North Pacific fisheries research plan.)

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Manton, Thomas J. [D-NY-7] · D–NY

Committees

Merchant Marine and Fisheries Committee

4 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Aug 10, 1994
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Aug 10, 1994
Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Feb 9, 1994
Subcommittee Hearings Held.
Sep 29, 1993
Subcommittee Hearings Held.
Sep 10, 1993
Field Hearings Held in Brooklyn, New York.
Aug 12, 1993
Field Hearings Held in Anchorage, Alaska.
Aug 10, 1993
Field Hearings Held in Portland, Oregon.
Jun 16, 1993
Subcommittee Hearings Held.
Apr 21, 1993
Subcommittee Hearings Held.
Mar 3, 1993
Subcommittee Hearings Held.
Feb 18, 1993
Executive Comment Requested from Commerce, State.
Feb 18, 1993
Referred to the Subcommittee on Fisheries Management.
Feb 3, 1993
Referred to the House Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries.
Feb 3, 1993
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E269)
Feb 3, 1993
Introduced in House
Feb 3, 1993
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Introduced in House · Feb 3, 1993 Formatted Text PDF

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Jan 2, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.780 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.780, 103rd Congress: To reauthorize the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/780

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1993-02-03.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr780/BILLS-103hr780ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-02T17:23:00Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.R.780 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.780 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.780, 103rd Congress: To reauthorize the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/780

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1993-02-03.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr780/BILLS-103hr780ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-02T17:23:00Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.780 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.780 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.780, 103rd Congress: To reauthorize the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/780

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1993-02-03.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr780/BILLS-103hr780ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-02T17:23:00Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.780 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.780 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.780, 103rd Congress: To reauthorize the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/780

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1993-02-03.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr780/BILLS-103hr780ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-02T17:23:00Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.780 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.