PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.775 / 106th Congress

Y2K Act

Became Public Law No: 106-37.

Official summary

Version 36 · Passed House amended · May 12, 1999

TABLE OF CONTENTS: Title I: Uniform Prelitigation Procedures for Year 2000 Actions Title II: Year 2000 Actions Involving Contracts Title III: Year 2000 Actions Involving Tort and Other Noncontractual Claim Title IV: Year 2000 Class Actions Title V: Client Protection in Connection with Year 2000 Actions Year 2000 Readiness and Responsibility Act - Makes this Act: (1) applicable to any year 2000 claim brought after January 1, 1999; and (2) inapplicable to any claim based on personal injury, including any claim that arises out of an underlying personal injury action. Allows a person who is liable for damages, whether by settlement or judgment, in a claim or civil action to which this Act does not apply by reason of the personal injury claim exclusion and whose liability, in whole or in part, is the result of a year 2000 failure, to pursue any remedy otherwise available under Federal or State law against the person responsible for that failure to the extent of recovering the amount of those damages. Specifies that any such remedy shall not be subject to this Act. Title I: Uniform Prelitigation Procedures for Year 2000 Actions - Requires a prospective plaintiff, before filing a year 2000 action, except in an action that seeks only injunctive relief, to provide to each prospective defendant a written notice that identifies with particularity as to any year 2000 claim: (1) any symptoms of a material defect alleged to have caused harm or loss; (2) the harm or loss allegedly suffered; (3) the facts that led the prospective plaintiff to hold such person responsible for both the defect and the injury; (4) the relief or action sought; and (5) the name, title, address, and telephone numbers of any individual who has authority to negotiate a resolution of the dispute on behalf of the prospective defendant. Specifies that such notice does not require descriptions of technical specifications or other technical details with respect to the material defect at issue. Bars a prospective plaintiff from commencing an action in Federal or State court until the expiration of 90 days after the date on which such notice is provided. Excludes such 90-day period in the computation of any applicable statute of limitations. Requires each prospective defendant, not less than 30 days after receipt of notice, to send by certified mail to each prospective plaintiff a written statement acknowledging such receipt and describing any actions it has taken or will take by not later than 60 days after the end of that 30-day period to remedy the problem identified. Makes such statement inadmissible in evidence in any proceeding to prove liability for, or the invalidity of a claim or its amount, or otherwise as evidence of conduct or statements made in compromise negotiations. Presumes such notice to be received seven days after it was sent. Sets forth provisions regarding failure to respond, failure to provide notice, the effect of contractual waiting periods, sanctions for frivolous invocation of the stay provision, and time computations. Makes requirements under this title applicable only to named plaintiffs in a year 2000 action that is maintained as a class action in Federal or State court. (Sec. 102) Allows either party, at any time during the 90-day period, to request the other to use alternative dispute resolution (ADR). Specifies that resolution of the issues by the parties prior to litigation through negotiation or ADR shall foreclose any further proceedings with respect to those issues. (Sec. 103) Requires the complaint, with respect to any year 2000 action: (1) that seeks the award of money damages, to state with particularity the nature and amount of each element of damages and the factual basis for the damages calculation; and (2) in which the plaintiff alleges that a product or service was defective, to identify with particularity the symptoms of the material defects and to state with particularity the facts supporting the conclusion that the defects are material. Sets forth provisions regarding state of mind, motion to dismiss, stay of discovery, and preservation of evidence. (Sec. 104) Directs that damages awarded for any year 2000 claim exclude compensation for damages that the plaintiff could reasonably have avoided in light of any disclosure or other information of which the plaintiff was, or reasonably should have been, aware. Title II: Year 2000 Actions Involving Contracts - Makes fully enforceable in any year 2000 action any written contractual term, including a limitation or exclusion of liability or a disclaimer of warranty, unless the enforcement of that term would manifestly and directly contravene applicable State law embodied in any statute in effect on January 1, 1999, specifically addressing that term, subject to a specified limitation where a contract is silent with respect to a particular issue. (Sec. 202) Requires, with respect to any year 2000 claim for breach or repudiation of contract, that the applicability of the doctrines of impossibility and commercial impracticability be determined by law in existence on January 1, 1999. Specifies that to the extent that impossibility or commercial impracticability is raised as a defense against claim for breach or repudiation of contract, the party asserting the defense shall be allowed to offer evidence that its implementation of the contract, or its efforts to implement it, were reasonable in light of the circumstances. (Sec. 203) Prohibits any party, with respect to any year 2000 claim involving a breach of contract or a claim related to the contract, from claiming or being awarded any category of damages unless such damages are allowed by the express terms of contract, or if the contract is silent on such damages by operation of the applicable Federal or State law that governed interpretation of the contract at the time the contract was entered into. Title III: Year 2000 Actions Involving Tort and Other Noncontractual Claims - Makes a person against whom a final judgment is entered in a year 2000 claim, other than a claim for breach or repudiation of contract, liable solely for the portion of the judgment that corresponds to the percentage of liability of the person, as determined under this title. Directs the court to instruct the jury to answer special interrogatories or, if there is no jury, make findings, with respect to each defendant and plaintiff, and each of the other persons claimed by any of the parties to have caused or contributed to the loss incurred by the plaintiff, concerning the percentage of responsibility of the defendant, the plaintiff, and each such person, measured as a percentage of the total fault of all persons who caused or contributed to the total loss incurred by the plaintiff. (Sec. 302) Bars liability with respect to any year 2000 claim for money damages in which the defendant is not the manufacturer, seller, or distributor of a product, or the provider of a service, that suffers or causes the year 2000 failure at issue, the plaintiff is not in substantial privity with the defendant, and the defendant's actual or constructive awareness of the actual or potential year 2000 failure is an element of the claim under applicable law, unless the plaintiff proves that the defendant actually knew, or recklessly disregarded a known and substantial risk, that such failure would occur. Sets forth provisions regarding: (1) a reasonable efforts defense; (2) limits on damages; and (3) liability of officers and directors. Title IV: Year 2000 Class Actions - Provides that in any year 2000 action involving a year 2000 claim that a product or service is defective, the action may be maintained as a class action in Federal or State law as to that claim only if it satisfies all other prerequisites established by applicable Federal or State law and if the court also finds that the alleged defect in the product or service was a material defect as to a majority of the members of the class. (Sec. 402) Sets forth provisions regarding notification, dismissal prior to certification, and Federal jurisdiction in year 2000 class actions. Title V: Client Protection In Connection with Year 2000 Actions - Makes this title applicable to any year 2000 action asserted or brought in Federal or State court. (Sec. 503) Requires an attorney, before being retained by a client with respect to a year 2000 claim or action, to disclose the client's rights under this title and the client's right to receive a written statement of information regarding fees and settlement proposals. (Sec. 504) Requires an attorney retained by a client with respect to a year 2000 claim or action to provide to the client: (1) within 30 days after such disclosure, a written statement setting forth the attorney's hourly fee or contingent fee for services in pursuing the claim or action and any conditions, limitations, restrictions, or other qualifications on the fee, including likely expenses and the client's obligation for those expenses; and (2) regular statements (at least once each 90 days) containing a description of hourly charges and expenses incurred. (Sec. 505) Sets forth provisions regarding the consumer's right to timely updated information about settlement proposals and a detailed statement of hours and fees. (Sec. 506) Requires an attorney representing a class or a defendant in a year 2000 action maintained as a class action to make the disclosures required under this title to the presiding judge, in addition to making such disclosures to each named representative of the class. Directs the presiding judge, at the outset of the year 2000 action, to determine a reasonable attorney's fee by determining the appropriate hourly rate and the maximum percentage of the recovery to be paid in attorney's fees. (Sec. 507) Sets forth provisions regarding the award of reasonable costs and attorney's fees after an offer of settlement. Directs the court, if it finds with respect to a year 2000 claim that the dollar amount of the judgment, verdict, or order that is finally issued is not more favorable to the offeree with respect to such claim than the last such offer, to order the offeree to pay the offeror's costs and expenses, including attorney's fees, subject to specified limitations. (Sec. 508) Authorizes a client whose attorney fails to comply with this title to file a civil action for damages in the court in which the year 2000 claim or action was filed or could have been filed or other court of competent jurisdiction. Makes the remedy provided by this section in addition to any other available remedy or penalty.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Davis, Tom [R-VA-11] · R–VA

Committees

  • Energy and Commerce Committee
  • Small Business Committee
  • Judiciary Committee
98 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 106-37.

  2. Became Public Law No: 106-37.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  8. Senate agreed to conference report by Yea-Nay Vote. 81-18. Record Vote No: 196. (consideration: CR S8017-8035)

    Senate roll call 196 · Individual votes
  9. Conference report agreed to in Senate: Senate agreed to conference report by Yea-Nay Vote. 81-18. Record Vote No: 196.(consideration: CR S8017-8035)

    Senate roll call 196 · Individual votes
  10. Conference report considered in Senate.

  11. Conference papers: message on House action held at the desk in Senate.

  12. Motions to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  13. On agreeing to the conference report Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 404 - 24 (Roll no. 265). (consideration: CR H5196-5206)

    House roll call 265 · Individual votes
  14. Conference report agreed to in House: On agreeing to the conference report Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 404 - 24 (Roll no. 265).(consideration: CR H5196-5206)

    House roll call 265 · Individual votes
  15. The previous question was ordered without objection.

  16. DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the conference report on H.R. 775.

  17. Mr. Goodlatte brought up conference report H. Rept. 106-212 for consideration under the provisions of H. Res. 234.

  18. Rule H. Res. 234 passed House.

  19. Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 234 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of the conference report to H.R. 775 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions. Rule waives all points of order against the conference report and against its consideration.

  20. Conference report H. Rept. 106-212 filed. (text of conference report: CR H5066-5073)

  21. Conference report filed: Conference report H. Rept. 106-212 filed.(text of conference report: CR H5066-5073)

  22. Conferees agreed to file conference report.

  23. Conference committee actions: Conferees agreed to file conference report.

  24. Conference held.

  25. Conference committee actions: Conference held.

  26. The Speaker appointed conferees From the Committee on Commerce, for consideration of section 18 of the Senate amendment, and modifications committed to conference: Bliley, Oxley, and Dingell.

  27. The Speaker appointed conferees From the Committee on the Judiciary, for consideration of the House bill and the Senate amendment, and modifications committed to conference: Hyde, Sensenbrenner, Goodlatte, Conyers, and Lofgren.

  28. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  29. On motion that the House instruct conferees Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 426 - 0 (Roll no. 253). (consideration: CR H4851)

    House roll call 253 · Individual votes
  30. DEBATE - The House proceeded with 1 hour of debate on the motion to instruct the managers of the part of the House at the conference on the disagreeing votes of the two houses on the amendment of the Senate to the bill to ensure that their eventual report to the House reflects due regard for the substantive concerns of the high-technology community and the possible implications of the "y2k" date change on that community and on the Nation's economy; the substantive inputs of the Administration and of the bipartisan Leaderships in the Congress on the issues committed to conference; and the sense of the House that a decision not to follow this process will lead to a failure to enact legislation.

  31. Mr. Conyers moved that the House instruct conferees.

  32. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  33. On motion that the House disagree to the Senate amendment, and agree to a conference Agreed to without objection. (consideration: CR H4844-4851)

  34. Mr. Goodlatte asked unanimous consent that the House disagree to the Senate amendment, and agree to a conference.

  35. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  36. Senate appointed conferees. Bennett; Dodd From the Special Committee on the Year 2000 Technology Problems.

  37. Senate appointed conferees. Hatch; Thurmond; Leahy From the Committee on the Judiciary.

  38. Senate insists on its amendment asks for a conference, appoints conferees McCain; Stevens; Burns; Gorton; Hollings; Kerry; Wyden From the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. (consideration: CR S7159)

  39. Passed Senate in lieu of S. 96 with an amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 62-37. Record Vote No: 165.

    Senate roll call 165 · Individual votes
  40. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate in lieu of S. 96 with an amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 62-37. Record Vote No: 165.

    Senate roll call 165 · Individual votes
  41. Senate struck all after the Enacting Clause and substituted the language of S. 96 amended.

  42. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S6998)

  43. Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 113.

  44. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  45. On passage Passed by recorded vote: 236 - 190 (Roll no. 128).

    House roll call 128 · Individual votes
  46. Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 236 - 190 (Roll no. 128).

    House roll call 128 · Individual votes
  47. On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by recorded vote: 184 - 246 (Roll no. 127). (consideration: CR H3051-3053)

    House roll call 127 · Individual votes
  48. The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection.

  49. Mr. Conyers moved to recommit with instructions to Judiciary.

  50. The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.

  51. The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

  52. The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 775.

  53. DEBATE - Pursuant to the rule the Committee is proceeding with 1 hour of debate on the amendment in the nature of a substitute.

  54. ORDER OF BUSINESS - The Chair announced that recorded votes on the amendments postponed earlier will occur in the following order: The amendment offered by Mr. Scott and the amendment offered by Mr. Nadler.

  55. POSTPONED VOTE - The Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment offered by Mr. Nadler by voice vote and announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Goodlatte objected to the voice vote pending the absence of a quorum. Further proceedings on the amendment were postponed, and the point of no quorum was considered as withdrawn.

  56. DEBATE - Pursuant to the rule the Committee is proceeding with 20 minutes of debate on the amendment.

  57. POSTPONED VOTE - The Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment offered by Mr. Scott by voice vote and announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Goodlatte objected to the voice vote pending the absence of a quorum. Further proceedings on the amendment were postponed, and the point of no quorum was considered as withdrawn.

  58. DEBATE - Pursuant to the rule the Committee is proceeding with 20 minutes of debate on the amendment.

  59. DEBATE - Pursuant to the rule the Committee is proceeding with 20 minutes of debate on the amendment.

  60. DEBATE - Pursuant to the rule the Committee is proceeding with 20 minutes of debate on the amendment.

  61. DEBATE - Pursuant to the rule the Committee is proceeding with 20 minutes of debate on the amendment.

  62. GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 775.

  63. House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 166 and Rule XXIII.

  64. The Speaker designated the Honorable Ray LaHood to act as Chairman of the Committee.

  65. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 775 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The rule makes in order as an original bill for the purpose of amendment, the Committee on the Judiciary amendment in the nature of a substitute now printed in the bill, modified by the amendments printed in part 1 of H. Rept. 106-134 accompanying the rule. Measure will be considered read. Specified amendments are in order. Makes in order only those amendments printed in part 2 of H. Rept. 106-134; provides that the amendments may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, debatable for the time specified in the report, not be subject to amendment, and not be subje...

  66. Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 166. (consideration: CR H3013-3053; text of measure as reported in House: CR H3026-3030)

  67. Rule H. Res. 166 passed House.

  68. Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 166 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 775 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The rule makes in order as an original bill for the purpose of amendment, the Committee on the Judiciary amendment in the nature of a substitute now printed in the bill, modified by the amendments printed in part 1 of H. Rept. 106-134 accompanying the rule. Measure will be considered read. Specified amendments are in order. Makes in order only those amendments printed in part 2 of H. Rept. 106-134; provides that the amendments may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, debatable for the time specified in the report, not be subject to amendment, and not be subje...

  69. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 73.

  70. Committee on Commerce discharged.

  71. Committee on Commerce discharged.

  72. Referred sequentially to the House Committee on Commerce for a period ending not later than May 11, 1999 for consideration of such provisions of the introduced bill as fall within the jurisdiction of that committee pursuant to clause 1(f), rule X.

  73. Committee on Small Business discharged.

  74. Committee on Small Business discharged.

  75. House Committee on Small Business Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than May 7, 1999.

  76. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 106-131, Part I. Filed late, pursuant to previous special order.

  77. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 106-131, Part I. Filed late, pursuant to previous special order.

  78. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 15 - 14.

  79. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  80. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  81. Committee Hearings Held.

  82. Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Small Business, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  83. Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Small Business, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  84. Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Small Business, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  85. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E243)

  86. Introduced in House

  87. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.775 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.775 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.775 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.775 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources