PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.774 / 114th Congress

Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing Enforcement Act of 2015

Became Public Law No: 114-81.

Official summary

Version 82 · Passed Senate without amendment · Oct 21, 2015

(This measure has not been amended since it was passed by the House on July 27, 2015. The summary of that version is repeated here.)

Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing Enforcement Act of 2015

This bill revises enforcement mechanisms of several Acts to address illegal, unreported, or unregulated (IUU) fishing.

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

TITLE I--STRENGTHENING FISHERIES ENFORCEMENT MECHANISMS

(Sec. 101) This bill amends the High Seas Driftnet Fishing Moratorium Protection Act to revise and apply its enforcement provisions to:

the Pacific Salmon Treaty Act of 1985,

the Dolphin Protection Consumer Information Act,

the Tuna Conventions Act of 1950,

the North Pacific Anadromous Stocks Act of 1992,

the Atlantic Tunas Convention Act of 1975,

the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Convention Act of 1995,

the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Convention Implementation Act, and

the Antigua Convention Implementing Act of 2015.

The High Seas Driftnet Fishing Moratorium Protection Act is revised to direct the Department of Commerce to prevent a person from violating those Acts in the same manner as though specified enforcement provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA) had been incorporated into each Act, including civil and criminal penalties, permit sanctions, and civil forfeiture procedures. Additional enforcement authorities are established with respect to searches and seizures, inspections, shipment detentions, the carrying of firearms, arrests, and the execution of subpoenas.

The MSA is amended to make it unlawful for any person to import, export, transport, sell, acquire, or purchase in interstate or foreign commerce any fish taken, possessed, transported, or sold in violation of any treaty or in contravention of any binding conservation measure adopted by an international agreement or organization to which the United States is a party.

Commerce may: (1) engage in international cooperation to help other nations combat IUU fishing and achieve sustainable fisheries; and (2) disclose certain enforcement information to state or federal agencies or internationally to ensure compliance with measures Commerce enforces, including international fishery agreements to which the United States is a party. Commerce is subject to the data confidentiality provisions of the MSA, except with respect to: (1) obligations of the United States to share information under a regional fisheries management organization of which the United States is a member, or (2) information collected by Commerce regarding foreign vessels.

The High Seas Driftnet Fishing Moratorium Protection Act is amended to require Commerce to take actions to improve the effectiveness of arrangements made pursuant to an international fishery agreement in conserving and managing fish stocks under its jurisdiction.

Commerce may: (1) develop and publish a list of vessels engaged in IUU fishing or fishing-related activities in support of IUU, including vessels or vessel owners identified by an international fishery management organization or arrangement made pursuant to an international fishery agreement; and (2) take action against listed vessels.

Certain sanctions concerning IUU fishing are revised. The bill eliminates the denial of port privileges to vessels because Commerce has not yet issue a certification that a nation's nationals or vessels are not engaging in IUU fishing.

Commerce must identify nations that: (1) violate conservation and management measures required under an international fishery management agreement to which the United States is a party, or (2) fail to effectively address or regulate IUU fishing or practices in the last three years. Provisions of the High Seas Driftnet Fishing Moratorium Protection Act that apply to nations are applied to other entities that have competency to enter into international fishery management agreements as appropriate.

The bill authorizes enforcement programs for the fishery laws mentioned in this title and for the identification of those nations through FY2020.

(Sec. 102) The High Seas Driftnet Fisheries Enforcement Act is amended to require denial of port privileges and other sanctions for fishing vessels of a nation that receives a negative IUU or conservation certification.

(Sec. 106) The Antarctic Marine Living Resources Convention Act of 1984 is amended to remove a requirement that, in order to be a violation of the Act, a person knew, or reasonably should have known, that an Antarctic marine living resource was harvested in violation of the Act. Commerce may publish in the Federal Register a final regulation to implement certain conservation measures.

(Sec. 107) The Atlantic Tunas Convention Act of 1975 is amended to remove a requirement for Commerce to submit an annual report on the conservation and management of highly migratory species.

(Sec. 108) The High Seas Fishing Compliance Act of 1995 is amended to void high seas fishing permits if any other required permit or authorization is expired, revoked, or suspended or if the vessel is no longer documented under U.S. laws or eligible for the documentation.

TITLE II--IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ANTIGUA CONVENTION

Antigua Convention Implementing Act of 2015

(Sec. 202) The Tuna Conventions Act of 1950 is amended to revise provisions regarding: (1) the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission, (2) the General Advisory Committee, (3) the Scientific Advisory Subcommittee, and (4) enforcement.

(Sec. 210) The Eastern Pacific Tuna Licensing Act of 1984 is repealed. TITLE III--AGREEMENT ON PORT STATE MEASURES TO PREVENT, DETER AND ELIMINATE ILLEGAL, UNREPORTED AND UNREGULATED FISHING Port State Measures Agreement Act of 2015 (Sec. 304) Commerce may promulgate regulations to carry out the implementation of the Agreement on Port State Measures to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing, done at the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, in Rome, Italy, November 22, 2009, and signed by the United States November 22, 2009. The Agreement provides tools for nations to address IUU fishing and to prevent IUU-caught fish from entering markets and competing with legally-caught fish. It recognizes that all seafood must pass through a port to get to market and allows nations to use inspections to prevent IUU fish from reaching the market.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Del. Bordallo, Madeleine Z. [D-GU-At Large] · D–GU

Committees

  • Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee
  • Judiciary Committee
  • Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
  • Natural Resources Committee
39 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 114-81.

  2. Became Public Law No: 114-81.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  8. Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.

  9. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.

  10. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation discharged by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S7407)

  11. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation discharged by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S7407)

  12. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

  13. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  14. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H5479-5484)

  15. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H5479-5484)

  16. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 774.

  17. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5478-5486)

  18. Mrs. Radewagen moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  19. Referred sequentially to the House Committee on the Judiciary for a period ending not later than July 30, 2015 for consideration of such provisions of the bill and amendment as fall within the jurisdiction of that committee pursuant to clause 1(l), rule X.

  20. Committee on Transportation discharged.

  21. Committee on Transportation discharged.

  22. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 114-212, Part I.

  23. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 114-212, Part I.

  24. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Unanimous Consent.

  25. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  26. Subcommittee on Water, Power and Oceans Discharged.

  27. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  28. Referred to the Subcommittee on Water, Power and Oceans.

  29. Referred to the Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation.

  30. Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  31. Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  32. Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  33. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E175)

  34. Introduced in House

  35. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.774 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.774 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.774 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.774 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources