PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.767 / 115th Congress

SOAR to Health and Wellness Act of 2018

Became Public Law No: 115-398.

Official summary

Version 49 · Public Law · Dec 31, 2018

Stop, Observe, Ask, and Respond to Health and Wellness Act of 2018 or the SOAR to Health and Wellness Act of 2018

(Sec. 2) This bill provides statutory authority for and expands the Department of Health and Human Services program known as the Stop, Observe, Ask, and Respond to Health and Wellness Training Program or the SOAR to Health and Wellness Training Program.

The program trains health care and social service providers to:

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

identify potential human trafficking victims,

work with law enforcement to report and facilitate communication with such victims,

refer victims to social or victims service agencies or organizations, and

provide such victims with coordinated care tailored to their circumstances.

The program must include the functions of the training program with the same name that was operating before this bill's enactment and the following initiatives:

engaging stakeholders to develop a flexible training module,

providing technical assistance relating to program activities,

developing a methodology for collecting and reporting data on the number of human trafficking victims served through the program, and

integrating program training with other types of training for health care and social service providers (e.g., training regarding sexual assault victims).

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Cohen, Steve [D-TN-9] · D–TN

Committees

  • Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee
  • Energy and Commerce Committee
11 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 115-398.

  2. Became Public Law No: 115-398.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  8. On motion that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 386 - 6 (Roll no. 462). (consideration: CR H10439-10440; text: CR H10424)

    House roll call 462 · Individual votes
  9. Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 386 - 6 (Roll no. 462).(consideration: CR H10439-10440; text: CR H10424)

    House roll call 462 · Individual votes
  10. At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.

  11. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on the motion to suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment to H.R. 767.

  12. Mr. Guthrie moved that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment. (consideration: CR H10424-10425)

  13. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  14. Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote.

  15. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote.

  16. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S7949-7950)

  17. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions discharged by Unanimous Consent.

  18. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions discharged by Unanimous Consent.

  19. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

  20. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  21. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H1234-1235)

  22. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H1234-1235)

  23. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 767.

  24. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H1234-1236)

  25. Mr. Burgess moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  26. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 237.

  27. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 115-327.

  28. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 115-327.

  29. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

  30. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  31. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Voice Vote .

  32. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  33. Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.

  34. Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

  35. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E107)

  36. Introduced in House

  37. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Dec 5, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.767 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.767 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.767 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.767 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources