On motion to refer the bill and the accompanying veto message to the Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities. Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 36 · Passed House amended · Sep 27, 1995
Teamwork for Employees and Managers Act of 1995 - Amends the National Labor Relations Act to allow employers to establish, assist, maintain, or participate in an organization or entity in which employees participate, to at least the same extent practicable as do representatives of management, to address matters of mutual interest (including, but not limited to, issues of quality, productivity, efficiency, and safety and health) if such organizations or entities do not have, claim, or seek authority to: (1) be the exclusive bargaining representative of the employees; or (2) negotiate, enter into, or amend collective bargaining agreements. Makes such amendment inapplicable in any case in which a labor organization is the representative of such employees (any unionized workplace). Provides that nothing in this Act shall affect employee rights and responsibilities contained in provisions other than the specific provision amended.
The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 743.
VOTE POSTPONED - At the conclusion of debate, the Chair put the question on the Doggett amendment and announced that, by voice vote, the amendment was not agreed to. Mr. Doggett requested a recorded vote. Pursuant to the earlier unanimous consent agreement, further proceedings on the amendment were postponed.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Doggett amendment.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Traficant amendment.
VOTE POSTPONED - At the conclusion of debate, the Chair put the question on the Moran amendment and announced that, by voice vote, the amendment was agreed to. Mr. Goodling requested a recorded vote. Pursuant to the earlier unanimous consent agreement, further proceedings on the amendment were postponed.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 5 additional minutes of debate on the Moran amendment.
The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
Considered as unfinished business.
Mr. Clay asked unanimous consent that the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may postpone until a time during further consideration in the Committee a request for a recorded vote on any amendment, and that the Chairman may reduce to not less than five minutes the time for voting by electronic device on any postponed question that immediately follows another vote by electronic device without intervening business, provided that the time for voting by electronic device on the first in any series of questions shall be not less than 15 minutes. Agreed to without objection.
Mr. Clay asked unanimous consent that during the further consideration of the bill in the Committee of the Whole pursuant to H. Res. 226, no further amendment shall be in order except the following: 1. The Traficant amendment, debatable for 10 minutes; 2. the Dogget amendment, debatable for 10 minutes. Mr. Clay asked further unanimous consent that each amendment be offered only in the order and manner specified; that the amendments be considered read; debatable for the time specified; not subject to further amendment; and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question. Agreed to without objection.
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 743 as unfinished business.
On motion that the committee rise Agreed to by voice vote.
Mr. Goodling moved that the committee rise.
GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate.
The Speaker designated the Honorable Jim Kolbe to act as Chairman of the Committee.
House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 226 and Rule XXIII.
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 743 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be read by section. Bill is open to amendments. The rule makes in order the Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities amendment in the nature of a substitute as an original bill for the purpose of amendment. Members who have pre-printed their amendments in the Congressional Record prior to their consideration will be given priority in recognition to offer their amendments.
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 226. (consideration: CR H9523-9556)
Rule H. Res. 226 passed House.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 226 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 743 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be read by section. Bill is open to amendments. The rule makes in order the Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities amendment in the nature of a substitute as an original bill for the purpose of amendment. Members who have pre-printed their amendments in the Congressional Record prior to their consideration will be given priority in recognition to offer their amendments.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 134.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Economic and Educational. H. Rept. 104-248.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Economic and Educational. H. Rept. 104-248.
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 22 - 19.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Committee Hearings Held.
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 8 - 4.
Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Employer-Employee Relations.
Executive Comment Requested from Labor.
Referred to the House Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E220-221)
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Mar 23, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.743 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.743 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.743 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.743 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.