PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jan 30, 2026
GRAS Oversight and Transparency Act
This bill requires the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to establish a board to review determinations made by food manufacturers prior to the year 2000 that certain substances are safe for use in food.
Under current law, substances added to food must generally be approved by the FDA. However, substances that are generally recognized as safe (GRAS) by qualified experts are exempt from the FDA's premarket review. Manufacturers are not required to notify the FDA when they designate a substance as GRAS.
Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.
Under the bill, each food manufacturer must provide the board with a list of pre-2000 GRAS designations attributable to the manufacturer. Manufacturers who do not comply may be subject to specified penalties. The board must review each designation and notify Congress and the FDA of (1) a determination that a substance has not been shown to be safe, and (2) a recommendation that the FDA revoke a GRAS designation.
After receiving such a notification, if the FDA decides to revoke the GRAS designation, it must notify the manufacturer and provide them an opportunity to offer evidence of the substance’s safety. The FDA must review its revocation decision using such evidence. The FDA must also establish procedures to ensure compliance with a revocation, including a timeline for recalling and ceasing distribution of substances.
The board must report to the FDA and Congress with information about reviews carried out under the bill.
The bill terminates 10 years after enactment.
People & committees
Rep. Lawler, Michael [R-NY-17] · R–NY
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Oct 29, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.7291 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.7291 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.7291 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.7291 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.