Community Development Financial Institutions Fund Securities Guarantee Act of 1995
Referred to the Subcommittee on Housing and Community Opportunity.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jan 27, 1995
Community Development Financial Institutions Fund Securities Guarantee Act of 1995 - Amends the Community Development Banking and Financial Institutions Act of 1994 to authorize the Secretary of the Treasury to issue guarantees for debt securities issued by the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund. Specifies a $2 billion per fiscal year maximum and 20-year term for such guarantees. Sets forth provisions limiting such guarantees and their costs to the extent such amounts are provided in advance in appropriation Acts. Provides that a prohibition under the Act against Fund issuance of stocks, bonds, debentures, notes or other securities shall not apply to its issuance of guaranteed debt instruments. Prohibits the use of proceeds from the issuance of such securities to provide financial assistance, including equity investment, to any community development financial institution with assets of more than $50 million.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.722 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.722 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.722 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.722 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.