PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.722 / 103rd Congress

To provide Indian education assistance to carry out the purposes of title IV of the Arizona-Idaho Conservation Act of 1988, Public Law 100-696, to provide for reimbursement to the Treasury by certain private parties, and for other purposes.

Referred to the Subcommittee on Elementary, Secondary and Vocational Education.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 2, 1993

Establishes in the Treasury the Interim Arizona InterTribal Education Assistance Trust Fund and the Interim Navajo Education Assistance Trust Fund (interim education funds). Subjects such funds to the same conditions as those for the Arizona InterTribal Trust Fund and the Navajo Trust Fund (permanent funds) under the Arizona-Idaho Conservation Act of 1988. Authorizes appropriations. Requires reimbursement of such sums to the Treasury by the Barron Collier Co. in fulfillment of its obligations under such Act.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Kyl, Jon [R-AZ-4] · R–AZ

Committees

  • Education and Workforce Committee
1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to the Subcommittee on Elementary, Secondary and Vocational Education.

  2. Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.

  3. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E237-238)

  4. Introduced in House

  5. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Jul 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.722 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.722 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.722 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.722 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources