PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.7218 / 118th Congress

BOLD Infrastructure for Alzheimer's Reauthorization Act of 2024

Became Public Law No: 118-142.

Official summary

Version 49 · Public Law · Dec 11, 2024

BOLD Infrastructure for Alzheimer's Reauthorization Act of 2024

This act reauthorizes through FY2029 several programs that are administered by the Department of Health and Human Services to support research and resources related to Alzheimer's disease and related dementias.

Specifically, the act reauthorizes (1) cooperative agreements with state, local, and tribal health departments to address Alzheimer's disease and related dementias through education, early detection, caregiver support, and other avenues; (2) regional centers that raise awareness and support research regarding these conditions; and (3) data collection on the incidence and prevalence of these conditions.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Guthrie, Brett [R-KY-2] · R–KY

Committees

  • Energy and Commerce Committee
79 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 118-142.

  2. Became Public Law No: 118-142.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  8. Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S6696)

  9. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S6696)

  10. Received in the Senate, read twice.

  11. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  12. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H5295)

  13. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H5295)

  14. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 7218.

  15. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5295-5296)

  16. Mrs. Miller-Meeks moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

  17. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 428.

  18. Reported by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 118-515.

  19. Reported by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 118-515.

  20. Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 44 - 0.

  21. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

  22. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by the Yeas and Nays: 25 - 0.

  23. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

  24. Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.

  25. Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

  26. Introduced in House

  27. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: May 27, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.7218 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.7218 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.7218 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.7218 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources