To require the accreditation of English language training programs, and for other purposes.

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

H.R.7093 through Congress

H.R.7093 keeps its number as it moves between the House and Senate.

HouseSep 25, 2008IntroducedOfficial record

Major milestones in the imported record. See all actions.

No Senate action is available in our imported record yet.

Separate related Senate measures (1)

These are different measures identified as related by Congress.gov. Their text and outcomes may differ; they are not the Senate stage of H.R.7093.

Related Senate bill: S.3658 A bill to require the accreditation of English language training programs, and for other purposes.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Sep 25, 2008

Amends the Immigration and Nationality Act to require that a nonimmigrant foreign student seeking to enter the United States to study at a language training program enroll in a program recognized as accredited by the Secretary of Education.

Provides for a specified three-year exception to such requirement.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Frank, Barney [D-MA-4] · D–MA

Committees

Judiciary Committee

1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Rep. Chabot, Steve [R-OH-1]

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Sep 25, 2008
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Sep 25, 2008
Introduced in House
Sep 25, 2008
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Introduced in House · Sep 25, 2008 Formatted Text PDF Formatted XML

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

S 3658 · A bill to require the accreditation of English language training programs, and for other purposes.

Source last updated: Nov 27, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.7093 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.7093, 110th Congress: To require the accreditation of English language training programs, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/110th-congress/house-bill/7093

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 2008-09-25.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/110/bills/hr7093/BILLS-110hr7093ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-11-27T00:28:48Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.R.7093 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.7093 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.7093, 110th Congress: To require the accreditation of English language training programs, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/110th-congress/house-bill/7093

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 2008-09-25.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/110/bills/hr7093/BILLS-110hr7093ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-11-27T00:28:48Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.7093 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.7093 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.7093, 110th Congress: To require the accreditation of English language training programs, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/110th-congress/house-bill/7093

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 2008-09-25.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/110/bills/hr7093/BILLS-110hr7093ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-11-27T00:28:48Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.7093 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.7093 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.7093, 110th Congress: To require the accreditation of English language training programs, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/110th-congress/house-bill/7093

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 2008-09-25.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/110/bills/hr7093/BILLS-110hr7093ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-11-27T00:28:48Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.7093 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.