PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.7082 / 119th Congress

FLEX Act

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 566.

Official summary

Version 07 · Reported to House · May 13, 2026

Fostering Learning and Excellence in Charter Schools Act or the FLEX Act

This bill expands and revises the Charter Schools Program (CSP), including by expanding the allowable uses of CSP funds.

Current law authorizes competitive grants to state entities (e.g., state educational agencies and state charter school boards) and, through them, subgrants to eligible applicants (i.e., charter school developers) to enable them to open and prepare for the operation of a new charter school or replicate or expand an existing high-quality charter school. 

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

The bill allows subgrants to also be used for adding or expanding programs or other offerings at these schools, such as through the adoption of new academic programs or delivery models, personalized learning, or a new curricular approach. New offerings must enable additional students to enroll in and benefit from the school.

Eligible applicants may also use CSP funds for activities such as 

hiring and compensating teachers and other school staff (currently, this may only occur during the planning period);

carrying out necessary renovations, upgrades, or facility repairs, or acquiring portable classrooms; and

providing transportation to students (currently, only one-time, start-up transportation costs are permitted).

Eligible applicants may request and receive advance payments of subgrants.

Among other requirements, the Department of Education must (1) use CSP funds for additional activities (e.g., increasing the number of available seats in charter schools that serve rural students and students with disabilities), and (2) consult with charter school operators prior to issuing a notice of proposed rulemaking relevant to charter schools.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Mackenzie, Ryan [R-PA-7] · R–PA

Committees

  • Education and Workforce Committee
6 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 566.

  2. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Education and Workforce. H. Rept. 119-651.

  3. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Education and Workforce. H. Rept. 119-651.

  4. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 19 - 15.

  5. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

  6. Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

  7. Introduced in House

  8. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 19, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.7082 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.7082 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.7082 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.7082 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources