PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 1, 2023
Housing Oversight and Mitigating Exploitation Act of 2023 or the HOME Act of 2023
This bill requires oversight and investigations into potentially unfair pricing practices in the residential rental and single-family housing markets.
The bill makes it unlawful to rent or sell a dwelling unit or single-family home at an unconscionably excessive and exploitative price during a housing emergency declared by the President. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and state attorneys general may enforce these provisions.
Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.
In addition, HUD must carry out investigations and other activities to address market manipulation and the role of institutional investors in the pricing of rental units and single-family homes. In particular, HUD must
investigate market manipulation and price gouging practices that affect rent or sale prices;
establish an office to collect, monitor, and analyze data on housing markets to support competitive market practices, identify market manipulation, and facilitate enforcement of housing protections; and
monitor housing markets to determine whether any single purchaser is purchasing an excessive amount of housing.
Further, the bill directs various federal agencies to (1) collect data and identify practices that unfairly prevent rental housing applicants and tenants from accessing or staying in housing, and (2) identify anti-competitive behaviors in the single-family home and residential rental markets.
The bill also requires the Federal Housing Finance Agency to establish standards and criteria for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac regarding purchases of mortgages on multifamily rental housing. The standards and criteria must ensure certain renter protections and prevent egregious rent increases for the tenants in such housing.
People & committees
Rep. Horsford, Steven [D-NV-4] · D–NV
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Dec 16, 2024. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.702 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.702 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.702 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.702 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.