PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.700 / 110th Congress

Healthy Communities Water Supply Act of 2007

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jan 29, 2007

Healthy Communities Water Supply Act of 2007 - Amends the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to authorize appropriations for the pilot program for alternative water source projects.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. McNerney, Jerry [D-CA-11] · D–CA

Committees

  • Environment and Public Works Committee
  • Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
2 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

  2. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  3. On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 368 - 59 (Roll no. 130).

    House roll call 130 · Individual votes
  4. Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 368 - 59 (Roll no. 130).

    House roll call 130 · Individual votes
  5. On motion to recommit with instructions Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 427 - 0 (Roll no. 129).

    House roll call 129 · Individual votes
  6. The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection. (consideration: CR H2329)

  7. Mr. Price (GA) moved to recommit with instructions to Transportation. (consideration: CR H2328-2329; text: CR H2328)

  8. The House adopted the amendment as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.

  9. The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. (consideration: CR H2328)

  10. The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 700.

  11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question of adoption of an amendment which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.

  12. DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Conaway amendment under the five-minute rule.

  13. DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Sessions amendment under the five-minute rule.

  14. POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Price (GA) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes prevailed. Mr. Price (GA) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.

  15. DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Price(GA) amendment under the five-minute rule.

  16. DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Kucinich amendment under the five-minute rule.

  17. GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 700.

  18. The Speaker designated the Honorable Michael R. McNulty to act as Chairman of the Committee.

  19. House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 215 and Rule XVIII.

  20. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 700 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. Bill is open to amendments. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI.

  21. Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 215. (consideration: CR H2321-2330)

  22. Rule H. Res. 215 passed House.

  23. Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 215 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 700 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. Bill is open to amendments. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI.

  24. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 6.

  25. Reported by the Committee on Transportation. H. Rept. 110-15.

  26. Reported by the Committee on Transportation. H. Rept. 110-15.

  27. Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

  28. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  29. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Voice Vote .

  30. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  31. Subcommittee Hearings Held.

  32. Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment.

  33. Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

  34. Introduced in House

  35. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.700 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.700 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.700 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.700 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources