PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.671 / 106th Congress

Transition to Adulthood Program Act of 1999

Referred to the Subcommittee on Human Resources.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 10, 1999

Transition to Adulthood Program Act of 1999 - Amends part E (Foster Care and Adoption Assistance) of title IV of the Social Security Act and the Internal Revenue Code with regard to the transition of foster children to self-sufficiency, including the provision of nonresidential services to assist in such transition, making respective changes chiefly: (1) allowing States with approved part E plans to make foster care maintenance payments with respect to a child who has not attained age 21 who would otherwise be ineligible for such payments because of age if the child is completing secondary education, is enrolled in an institution that provides postsecondary education or vocational training, or is employed for at least 80 hours per month, and has a case plan providing for the child's achievement of independent living and residence in a setting that promotes personal responsibility; and (2) expanding the work opportunity tax credit to include certain individuals who, on the day before before attaining age 18, received foster care maintenance payments under an approved State part E plan or were in foster care under the responsibility of the State. Provides for an increase in the amount of assets allowable for children in foster care under SSA title IV part E. Directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) to establish an action plan to promote collaboration between HHS and other Federal programs to promote the self-sufficiency of children aging out of foster care. Provides, with respect to the independent living initiatives program under SSA title IV part E, for: (1) the use of updated foster care data in the funding formula for determining the basic amount for such program for a State for a fiscal year (while removing State entitlement to such basic amount under State plan provisions); and (2) a funding increase under such program.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Cardin, Benjamin L. [D-MD-3] · D–MD

Committees

  • Ways and Means Committee
7 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to the Subcommittee on Human Resources.

  2. Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

  3. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E192)

  4. Introduced in House

  5. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Aug 20, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.671 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.671 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.671 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.671 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources