PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.668 / 105th Congress

Airport and Airway Trust Fund Tax Reinstatement Act of 1997

Became Public Law No: 105-2.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 11, 1997

Airport and Airway Trust Fund Tax Reinstatement Act of 1997 - Amends the Internal Revenue Code to restore the Airport and Airway Trust Fund excise taxes. Extends authority to transfer revenue to such Fund.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Archer, Bill [R-TX-7] · R–TX

Committees

  • Ways and Means Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Became Public Law No: 105-2.

    2. Became Public Law No: 105-2.

    3. Signed by President.

    4. Signed by President.

    5. Presented to President.

    6. Presented to President.

    7. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    8. Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1771-1775)

    9. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S1771-1775)

    10. Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 19.

    11. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    12. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 347 - 73 (Roll no. 27).

      House roll call 27 · Individual votes
    13. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 347 - 73 (Roll no. 27).

      House roll call 27 · Individual votes
    14. Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H641)

    15. At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 5, rule I, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed until Feb. 26.

    16. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.

    17. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H598-605)

    18. Mr. Archer moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

    19. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 4.

    20. Reported by the Committee on Ways and Means. H. Rept. 105-5.

    21. Reported by the Committee on Ways and Means. H. Rept. 105-5.

    22. Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

    23. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    24. Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

    25. Introduced in House

    26. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.668 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.668 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.668 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.668 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources