PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.659 / 106th Congress

Pennsylvania Battlefields Protection Act of 1999

Became Public Law No: 106-86.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 9, 1999

TABLE OF CONTENTS: Title I: Paoli and Brandywine Battlefields Title II: Valley Forge National Historical Park Protect America's Treasures of the Revolution for Independence for Our Tomorrow Act, or the PATRIOT Act - Title I: Paoli and Brandywine Battlefields - Authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to provide funds to, and enter into a cooperative management agreement with, the borough of Malvern, Pennsylvania, for the protection and preservation of the Paoli Battlefield. Authorizes appropriations. Authorizes the Secretary to provide funds to, and enter into a cooperative management agreement with, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth, or the Brandywine Conservancy, for the protection and preservation of the Brandywine Battlefield in an area generally known as the Meetinghouse Road Corridor, located in Chester County, Pennsylvania. Authorizes appropriations. Requires the Secretary to report to specified congressional committees a resource study of the property in such battlefields. Authorizes appropriations. Title II: Valley Forge National Historical Park - Valley Forge Museum of the American Revolution Act of 1999 - Authorizes the Secretary, in administering the Valley Forge National Historical Park, to enter into an agreement with the Valley Forge Historical Society to facilitate the planning, construction, and operation of the Valley Forge Museum of the American Revolution on Federal land within the boundary of Valley Forge National Historical Park. Requires the agreement to provide for conveyance by the Society to the United States of all right, title, and interest in the structures to be constructed at the Park, reserving the Society's right to occupy and use them for the exhibition, preservation, and interpretation of artifacts associated with the Valley Forge story and the American Revolution.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Weldon, Curt [R-PA-7] · R–PA

Committees

  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
  • Natural Resources Committee
26 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 106-86.

  2. Became Public Law No: 106-86.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  8. On motion that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendments Agreed to by voice vote. (consideration: CR H10123-10127; text: CR H10123-10124)

  9. Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendments Agreed to by voice vote.(consideration: CR H10123-10127; text: CR H10123-10124)

  10. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on the Senate amendment to H.R. 659.

  11. Mr. Doolittle moved that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendments.

  12. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  13. Passed Senate with an amendment and an amendment to the Title by Unanimous Consent. (text: CR 10/15/99 S12727-12728)

  14. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment and an amendment to the Title by Unanimous Consent.(text: CR 10/15/99 S12727-12728)

  15. Amendment SP 2295 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.

  16. Amendment SP 2295 proposed by Senator Santorum for Senator Murkowski.

  17. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S12649-12650)

  18. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources discharged by Unanimous Consent.

  19. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources discharged by Unanimous Consent.

  20. Received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

  21. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  22. On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 418 - 4 (Roll no. 245).

    House roll call 245 · Individual votes
  23. Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 418 - 4 (Roll no. 245).

    House roll call 245 · Individual votes
  24. The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.

  25. The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

  26. The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 659.

  27. House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 210 and Rule XXIII.

  28. GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 659.

  29. The Speaker designated the Honorable Ray LaHood to act as Chairman of the Committee.

  30. House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 210 and Rule XXIII.

  31. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 659 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill, the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Resources now printed in the bill. Measure will be read by title. Bill is open to amendments.

  32. Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 210. (consideration: CR H4700-4708; text of title I as reported in House: CR H4706; text of title II as reported in House: CR H4706-4707)

  33. Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 210 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 659 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill, the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Resources now printed in the bill. Measure will be read by title. Bill is open to amendments.

  34. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 78.

  35. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 106-139.

  36. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 106-139.

  37. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

  38. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  39. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Voice Vote.

  40. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  41. Subcommittee Hearings Held.

  42. Executive Comment Requested from Interior.

  43. Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks and Public Lands.

  44. Referred to the House Committee on Resources.

  45. Introduced in House

  46. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.659 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.659 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.659 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.659 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources