PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.635 / 107th Congress

Homestead Steel Works National Historic Site Act

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 462.

Official summary

Version 17 · Reported to House with amendment(s) · Oct 11, 2002

Homestead Steel Works National Historic Site Act - Establishes in Pennsylvania the Homestead Steel Works National Historic Site (the Site) for inclusion within the National Park System. Specifies the historic properties to be included within the Site.Authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to acquire by donation specified property for inclusion within such Site.Authorizes the Secretary to: (1) enter into cooperative agreements to further the purposes of this Act; and (2) provide technical assistance for the preservation of the Site's structures, maintenance of its cultural landscape, and local preservation planning for the Site. Provides for the reimbursement of the United States if funds disbursed under a cooperative agreement are used for purposes contrary to the purposes of this Act.Directs the Secretary to prepare and submit to specified congressional committees a general management plan for the Site. Requires the Secretary, in preparing the plan, to consult with an appropriate official of the Steel Industry Heritage Corporation and an appropriate official of each appropriate political subdivision of Pennsylvania that has jurisdiction over all or a portion of the Site.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Doyle, Michael F. [D-PA-18] · D–PA

Committees

  • Natural Resources Committee
26 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 462.

  2. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 107-742.

  3. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 107-742.

  4. Subcommittee on National Parks, Recreation and Public Lands Discharged.

  5. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Unanimous Consent.

  6. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  7. Executive Comment Requested from Interior.

  8. Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Recreation and Public Lands.

  9. Referred to the House Committee on Resources.

  10. Introduced in House

  11. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.635 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.635 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.635 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.635 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources