PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.6337 / 117th Congress

Biking on Long-Distance Trails Act

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

Official summary

Version 53 · Passed House · Jul 19, 2022

Biking on Long-Distance Trails Act

This bill establishes requirements related to long-distance bike trails.

The Department of the Interior and the Department of Agriculture (USDA) shall identify

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

not fewer than 10 long-distance bike trails that make use of existing trails and roads, and

not fewer than 10 areas in which there is an opportunity to develop or complete a trail that would qualify as a long-distance bike trail.

Interior and USDA shall

develop a process to allow members of the public to comment regarding the identification of trails and areas; and

consider the identification, development, and completion of long-distance bike trails in a geographically equitable manner.

The Department concerned shall ensure that each identified long-distance bike trail or area does not conflict with

the uses of any trail or road that is part of that long-distance bike trail;

multiple-use areas where biking, hiking, horseback riding, or use by pack and saddle stock are existing uses;

the purposes for which any trail was or is established under the National Trails System Act; and

any area managed under the Wilderness Act.

The Department concerned shall also ensure that each identified long-distance trail or area complies with land use and management plans of the federal recreational lands that are part of that long-distance bike trail.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Neguse, Joe [D-CO-2] · D–CO

Committees

  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
  • Agriculture Committee
  • Natural Resources Committee
10 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

  2. Pursuant to section 9 of H. Res. 1232, and the motion offered by Ms. DeLauro, the following bills passed under suspension of the rules: H.R. 1286, as amended; H.R. 2024, as amended; H.R. 3222, as amended; H.R. 6337, as amended; and H.R. 7002, as amended. (consideration: CR H6859-6865; text: CR H6864)

  3. Passed/agreed to in House: Pursuant to section 9 of H. Res. 1232, and the motion offered by Ms. DeLauro, the following bills passed under suspension of the rules: H.R. 1286, as amended; H.R. 2024, as amended; H.R. 3222, as amended; H.R. 6337, as amended; and H.R. 7002, as amended.

  4. Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1232, proceedings on H.R. 6337 are considered vacated.

  5. At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.

  6. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 6337.

  7. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H6694-6695; text: CR H6694)

  8. Mr. Huffman moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  9. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 322.

  10. Committee on Agriculture discharged.

  11. Committee on Agriculture discharged.

  12. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 117-415, Part I.

  13. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 117-415, Part I.

  14. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Unanimous Consent.

  15. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  16. Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands Discharged.

  17. Subcommittee Hearings Held.

  18. Referred to the Subcommittee on Conservation and Forestry.

  19. Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands.

  20. Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  21. Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  22. Introduced in House

  23. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.6337 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.6337 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.6337 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.6337 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources