To clarify the provision of nutrition services to older Americans.
Became Public Law No: 109-368.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 49 · Public Law · Nov 17, 2006
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
Requires the Secretary of Agriculture to fulfill, and accept reimbursement from the Secretary of Health and Human Services for, commodity procurement requests for FY2007 submitted by the states and tribal organizations before November 14, 2006, in support of the operation of the nutrition services incentive program authorized under the Older Americans Act of 1965.
Received in the Senate, read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S10950)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Received in the Senate, read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S10950)
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On passage Passed without objection. (text: CR H8656)
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed without objection.(text: CR H8656)
Considered by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR H8656)
Mr. Tiberi asked unanimous consent to discharge from committee and consider.
Committee on Education and the Workforce discharged.
Committee on Education and the Workforce discharged.
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jul 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.6326 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.6326 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.6326 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.6326 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.