PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Received in the Senate.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Nov 14, 2016
This bill designates:
the United States Postal Service (USPS) facility located at 1221 State Street, Suite 12, Santa Barbara, California, as the "Special Warfare Operator Master Chief Petty Officer (SEAL) Louis 'Lou' J. Langlais Post Office Building";
the facility located at 23323 Shelby Road, Shelby, Indiana, as the "Richard Allen Cable Post Office";
Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.
the facility located at 3031 Veterans Road West, Staten Island, New York, as the "Leonard Montalto Post Office Building";
the facility located at 401 McElroy Drive, Oxford, Mississippi, as the "Army First Lieutenant Donald C. Carwile Post Office Building";
the facility located at 14231 TX-150, Coldspring, Texas, as the "E. Marie Youngblood Post Office";
the facility located at 810 N. U.S. Highway 83, Zapata, Texas, as the "Zapata Veterans Post Office";
the facility located at 2886 Sandy Plains Road, Marietta, Georgia, as the "Marine Lance Corporal Squire 'Skip' Wells Post Office Building";
the facility located at 6300 N. Northwest Highway, Chicago, Illinois, as the "Officer Joseph P. Cali Post Office Building;
the facility located at 1 Chalan Kanoa VLG, Saipan, Northern Mariana Islands, as the "Segundo T. Sablan and CNMI Fallen Military Heroes Post Office Building"; and
the facility located at 1101 Davis Street, Evanstan, Illinois, as the "Abner J. Mikva Post Office Building."
The USPS must designate, by September 30, 2017, a single, unique ZIP code for each of:
Miami Lakes, Florida;
Storey County, Nevada;
Flanders, Northampton, and Riverside in Southampton, New York;
Ocoee, Florida; and
Glendale, New York.
People & committees
Rep. Chaffetz, Jason [R-UT-3] · R–UT
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Received in the Senate.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text of measure as passed: CR H7008-7009)
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.(text of measure as passed: CR H7008-7009)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 6303.
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H7008-7010)
Mr. Gosar moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 160.
Reported by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. H. Rept. 114-843.
Reported by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. H. Rept. 114-843.
Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Aug 8, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.6303 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.6303 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.6303 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.6303 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.